US Government Genocide

Jobs for Genocide: Obama and the El Salvadorans

2012-01-12T07:03:00.000-08:00

January 12, 2012 A.D.

Salem (witchcraft) Radio Network reported a news blurb all day yesterday (or was it the day before)? Anyway, the blurb said basically that Barack Hussein (no relation to Saddam) Obama is calling for businesses in America not to send US jobs overseas.

Oh yeah. He cares. Uh huh.

Of course he did nothing in the past three years to prevent those jobs from going overseas while he had a Democratic Party congress for two solid years. We are to believe that suddenly he cares?

No.

He was too busy setting up a communist totalitarian scheme called Obamacare to be concerned about outsourcing US jobs. So now the scheme is to import low IQ barbarians from overseas who are easily bribed to vote for him through promises of communist welfare handouts. And suddenly the president is interested in jobs.

For the foreigners.

You can read about Obama's new voter-slash-genocide scheme here at the Independent Sentinal. What is that website about? Who knows, but you gotta love the photograph. They look like Obama types, don't they? The big media outlets don't seem to be reporting the story enough to get Google's attention perhaps. Anyway, reporting on Obama's genocide of WASP America might be just a tad bit boring for them. The Greeley Gazette has the story too. You've all heard of the Greeley Gazette, right? Here is their posting of the story.

We need foreigners here like we need holes in our heads. And that is just what Obama and his invaders would like to give us.

When we have high unemployment the last thing we need is one more immigrant. And we certainly don't need one more disloyal Hispanic American since every single Hispanic is disloyal. Each and every one of them. And especially those who serve in the military.

Obama is counting on that too, because he is as disloyal to America as every single Hispanic "American" is.

But Obama has a genocide of WASPish Americans to conduct and accomplish. And it dovetails neatly with his failed presidency that he would like to continue. He cannot destroy America utterly, his "fundamental [criminal and subversive] transformation", unless he replaces the remaining population of citizens who love America with those who don't (i.e. Hispanics). So he needs these foreign barbarians who are too stupid to know what is going on and too evil to care to come here and have OUR jobs.

The rest of us he wishes to go to hell. Apparently.

http://www.independentsentinel.com/2012/01/obama-gives-backdoor-amnesty-to-illegal-salvadorians-millions-in-aid-to-el-salvador/

http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/?p=12885

Rich White Americans Should Invest In White Babies Not Land

2011-10-13T06:04:00.000-07:00

October 13, 2011 A.D.

The Wall Street Journal has this article about the biggest land owner in America. (Hat-tip Drudge).

Outside of the issue as to whether it might be immoral (or should be illegal) for any one private individual to own so much land in the United States, the issue of what the rich do with their money at this time in American history could not be more important with regard to the genocide of white people in America by the US government through the immigration of stupid and disloyal hordes of foreigners for the purposes of destroying US sovereignty and subjugating the republic to a global government.

Land can be a great value during very tumultuous and uncertain times. But of even greater value in such times as these is preserving the race of the people that nurtured these great land owners: the white race. You know who they are. That is the race of the people in the paintings and portraits of our ancestors and Founding Fathers. We are their besieged posterity.

I suggest rich men like John Malone and Ted Turner start a project to build up the Caucasian race in America back to its previous status. They could do this by selecting out white families who already have children, are doing a fairly decent job of it, and would have many more children if they could afford it. This would be a foundation specifically designed to help white people increase their numbers. It would have a name similar to the United Negro College Fund, but would be called the Caucasian Family Fund, or whatever.

Now, if you think, dear reader, that I am a racist for saying something like this, I would ask you why you are being a racist for advocating that white people be made, against their will, a minority race in the land of their ancestors through the genocidal policies of their own government?

And I would ask you why you are a racist against white people (even if you were a white person). Because if there is any racism having to do with the topics discussed at the blog, it would be the racism of those that presumes white people ought not to be allowed to gather together in one place as they hitherto have done in this country since 1787 when the United States became a republic.

And I would ask you why you are not bothered that blacks are mainly gathered together in one place on the continent of Africa. Or that Asians are mainly gathered together in one place near China and surrounding territories.

If the voluntary gathering together of racial groups bothers you so much, why don't you move to foreign lands where such gatherings are more racially pure and mix it up a little with them. And tell them what bad people they are for having mono-racial cultures. Tell them they are racists for doing it. Tell it real loud.

I'd like to see that. If they murder you for the utterly stupid and asinine things you say I might send flowers to your funeral (if they gave you one).

Just leave my country alone. It's not a racial experiment for depraved and demented self-loathing white people like you who stupidly feel guilty about the slavery or discrimination you had nothing to do with.

Morons and racists like you don't deserve the blessings of liberty our white ancestors hoped and prayed their posterity would receive.

If you need to be absolved of something you did not do and cannot shake off the racist conclusions of your corrupt and twisted moral reasoning, professor Walter E Williams (whose grandparents were slaves in America) has granted you a full pardon for something you did not do but stupidly feel guilty for:

Here is your pardon, click on this line and receive it.

http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2011/10/12/john-malone-now-biggest-landowner-in-the-u-s/

http://econfaculty.gmu.edu/wew/gift.html

Racist Minorities Band Together: The Genocide of White Americans On the Agenda

2011-06-13T21:23:00.000-07:00

June 14, 2011

Are Jews now openly rising up against whites (and protestants) in "minority" political schemes after a half century of demonizing white Americans as racists through organizations like the Anti-Defamation League?

Read about a new ad by a Jewish politician at Alternative Right online.

See what a big joke all this is to the racists in the You Tube video below promoting a Jewish politician. I wonder if whites soon become a minority (with the help of Jews) will the Jews join up with them and devise racist schemes against brown people?

Who are these evil and non-white ungrateful people who now "hate" the people who have blessed them with a homeland by invitation?

Jews in America rose to the highest levels known to mankind and became great scientists, artists, scholars, and musicians in the bosom of white protestantism. They have reaped the blessings of Christianity and not of Buddhism or even Catholicism. The land of white Anglo-Saxon protestants opened its home to them, and what is the thanks for it? A slap in the face and conspiracy to commit genocide against the people who invited them in: white protestants.

Ban all Middle East immigration. Muslim, Arab, Persian, and Jew.

http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/district-of-corruption/minorities-united/

What Do Rape, Murder, Robbery, and Invasions Have in Common?

2011-06-02T19:40:00.000-07:00

June 2, 2011 A.D.

They are the opposite actions of consensual sex, killing, taxation, and immigration.

And I would like to use a recent article by Scott Lazarowitz at Lew Rockwell online to make that argument. Bazaarowitz thinks it is just fine and dandy to let the invaders invade. And he thinks to do otherwise (kick them out or have a legal system of entry) is socialist.

I'd like to make mince-meat of those ideas.

One of the biggest moral flaws in American Libertarian philosophy is the inability to make fine moral distinctions in a consistent manner. This is especially true with the subject of "illegal immigrants". That oxymoron is akin to calling rapists "illegal lovers". But Libertarians simply have drawn the wrong conclusions about the illegal aliens. And I will use three similar moral paradoxes to show how wrong Libertarians are about immigration and the barbarous invaders they would like us to embrace who come mostly from south of our border.

The first paradox is murder and killing. Murder is the taking of innocent life. It is premeditated. That means it is an intentional and unjust act to rob someone of their life. The other variety of this kind of action is killing. Killing is also the act of taking a life. It is the kind of thing that may happen if a man is defending his child from someone who is trying to murder the child. If in the process of defending the child the attacker is killed by the rescuer, no one in their right mind, not even the morally inept Libertarian, considers the killing of the attacker murder.

But both murder and killing which is not murder end with the loss of human life. And it is the reason or purpose behind their deaths that allows us to make a moral distinction between the two acts. Those reasons and purposes are essential to understanding the results.

The second paradox is rape and consensual sex. Rape involves forced sexual conduct against an individual. Consensual sex does not. Both acts involve sexual actions and use more or less the same sexual organs of the human body. One is a brutal attack and the other a loving and desirable activity between consenting adults. In the example of rape, only one person is expressing some level of sexual conduct using sexual organs. But the sexual nature of the attack is still present or else it would be "merely" assault. And we acknowledge the sexual nature of it by using the word rape.

The third paradox is theft and taxation. Theft is the taking of money or property that does not belong to you. This should stop the pro"immigrant" invasion Libertarians right in their tracks but it does not. Because surely American territory does not belong to the Mexican or Peruvian citizens. Or for that matter citizens from anywhere else in the world. And what land is not owned by the people themselves is held in common for them protected by the government. So I do not believe Libertarians who think otherwise are really Libertarians. Instead I believe they are Marxists posing as Libertarians. In other words they are criminally-minded people prone to advocating stealing and worse.

A government can steal and rob just as easily, if not better, than common thieves. Taxation for Social Security, for example is theft. And it is theft because the government has no legal authority to take money via taxation for that purpose according to the Constitution. Even if it did have that authority, I would still considered it morally repugnant. Let me state clearly that I am not for pulling the rug out from under the feet of older folks who paid into the S.S.system and made plans to collect it or are in need to getting back that money they paid out over many decades. I'm for abolishing the system but not all at once, nor unfairly. And vulnerable people ought to be protected from that.

On the other hand, taxation for that which the people have agreed to for the safety and security of their lives and property is not theft. This is especially important to women and children.

I get the impression that Libertarians may think the world should only belong to those who can protect themselves (and keep government out of it). But there happen to be tens of millions of people who are not big, nor strong, and if there wasn't some sort of power to protect them life would be exceedingly unjust. Thus, a stand-in for a strong man becomes requisite to protect the innocent. Thus this stand-in strong-man is a legitimate function of conglomerated power.

What would the Libertarians have orphans do, go to work a six and hire a body guard? I suppose so.

Thus if a stand-in strong-man can be a legitimate cause for the state (the conglomeration) for some, then it could be legitimate cause for all. Even an old, poor, and feeble Libertarian who lost all resources to protect himself might need that some day. Or his widowed wife. Defining this might be very tricky or difficult, especially if you are a Libertarian, but it can be done. Like many other things in life it is fraught with dangers. No news there.

If there is no government whatsoever then there is no civilization to speak of and human kind is reduced to tribes who continually prey on each other such that they are unable to advance to the point of the New York Philharmonic, discovering fractals, or inventing the computer. Life is spent hunting and being hunted by other humans and we are reduced to the cave man "life-style". This appears to be the goal of American Libertarians. What a bunch of chimpanzees. Oh wait. Chimps defend their own territory. I retract that and offer my apologies to chimps.

We know this tribalism happens when groups are too small to defend themselves long enough to establish fine art, advanced industry, technology, science, and music. These things and more Libertarians pretend to admire. And we also know from history that without some minimal form of government humans descend into a primitive state where advancement becomes next to impossible. Africa is a good example of this.

And if you do not know by now that there is something woefully wrong with the whole human race since the time we have been recording its history then you (Libertarians) are really too stupid to be giving out advice about how to conduct a civilization--especially one created by a barbarian invasion of persons who are not overly interested in intellectual pursuits. Even ones not interested in reading about economic theories or philosophies like libertarianism.

So the wisest course for intelligent humankind (I suppose that exempts American Libertarians) to take is for several tribes or so to agree to the most affectionate and useful conglomeration (government) they can create which will help protect them from the most odious tribes or groups of tribes who would harm them (like Libertarians and their not so bright barbarian friends with the high crime rate?).

I sense that our Founding generation hoped to have such created a good government. And I believe they did.Unfortunately our contemporary leaders are trying to destroy it. Especially the Democratic Party which openly wishes to subvert it through "fundamental" change.

What so, in my mind and I think the mind of all rational and moral people, I believe that Lazarowitz is actually suggesting is that we ought to enjoy it if a motor cycle gang burglarizing our home, laid claim to the property and possession while it forces us to pay the mortgage and keep the place up. They can eat out our existence, take liberties with the wife, attack the children, and steal their inheritance and political rights to self-determination. And why should we let them do all this? According to Lazarowitz we should let them do this because they are people too. Isn't that special? I'll bet you didn't realize they were people too you greedy dumb*ss racist pigs.

Libertarians say they value (almost above all) the concept of property. Yet there is no valuing property with invaders or burglars. Invading ones property (home, country) is theft and robbery. Invading your neighbors land is immoral except if you are a communist fink like Lazaroditz. The Libertarians should rename their new found quest for territorial theft "illegal ownership".

In summary.

Murder and killing end in death. One is evil, the other essential.
Rape and consensual sex involve sexual actions. One is evil, the other desired.
Theft and taxation is surrendering ones property. One is evil, the other essential.
Invasion and immigration is the entry of outsiders. One is burglary the other an invitation.

This is not rocket science, which wouldn't have developed if we left it up to the Libertarians, but the Libertarians are having a hard time figuring it out.

Libertarians just don't seem intellectually capable of understanding these moral distinctions. It is an obvious and curious moral failing. Well, at least it is obvious to me. And yet it is a major intellectual error which I am always surprised they make. And I don't believe the father of Libertarianism, Friedrich Hayek, would make it. Maybe Lazarowitz isn't a Libertarian, but Rockwell most certainly is and it seems very poor judgment for him to post Larzarowitz's nonsense on Lew Rockwell online.

Even Hayek recognized the value of custom and tradition, and felt that those who wished to eliminate them in wholesale fashion were not only unwise but dangerous. He also thought they were conceited. He said a person or group of people who held such grand schemes to force on others committed the error of THE fatal conceit. Hayek applied this idea to socialism. But any intentional large scale disruption of a whole civilization which destroys customs and traditions can result in the same cataclysmic turmoil.

These Libertarian supporters of the invading hordes pose the same threat as the socialists. That threat is the unknown consequences of major cultural upheavals forced on others. And yet the author of the Rockwell article actually thinks that it is lawful immigration that is akin to socialism. When in truth it is the invasion which Lazarowits wishes us to embrace that most resembles socialism and what it produces: unimaginable and devastating consequences.

It is very odd that Lazarowitz would consider an act as serious as reshaping an entire civilization by replacing a major portion of the citizenry with a different foreign culture and race to be any less an unpredictable upheaval than socialism. I think it is more than odd. It is stupid. And it shapes up to be another monumental fatal conceit.

Lazarowitz writes:

And that brings me to the American Declaration of Independence. In the Declaration, Thomas Jefferson wrote that "all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Each individual has an inalienable, inherent right of ownership of one’s own life, person, labor and justly-owned property, and pursuit of happiness, and the right to be free from the aggression against one’s life by others, including agents of the State...

...Here is where we lose the conservatives. The Declaration of Independence does not state that such rights apply to "only Americans."... Unfortunately, some people do not believe that non-"American citizens" possess such rights.

Ah. What a trickster this nincompoop Bazaarowitz is. And how convenient that this communist interloper writing at Lew Rockwell ignores the context of Mr. Jeffersons comments.

Jefferson is careful to define the context of his statements. He writes:

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

The key term in that very long sentence is "one people". Check it out. It comes in as the 12th and 13th words of the sentence. "One people" clearly means a specific group of people as set apart from all others. By this Lazarowitz implies that Jefferson either doesn't believe other people really do have unalieanable rights to secure and Jefferson is really lying, and that Jefferson didn't believe there were outsiders among mankind from which any "one people" might separate themselves.

I suggest Lazarowitz is pretending that Jefferson did not distinguish between the in group (Jefferson's group) and the out group (the British). By Bazaarowitz's inept reasoning, we should believe that the British citizens including government officials (since they are people too) should have been let in to invade the new founded "separated" people in America and run things as they saw fit.

Totally BAZAARO!

Okay, that is twisted. But it isn't MY reasoning. It's Bazaarowits'.

Jefferson further writes:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Okay, another mouthful for those who went to public school. But let me point out a few things from that passage which make a nitwit out of Lazarowitz . Jefferson is saying that a government has the right (by the consent of the people) to define itself. Well, if that people are being invaded by outsiders where is the right to group self-determination by "one people" who have separated themselves from the others?

It is nowhere to be found.

In other words unless a people cannot be separated from others in order determine what form of association they shall have themselves, they will be stripped of a power to group self-determination. And who is Lazarowitz to say such a group of individuals should have no such power? And who the hell is Lazarowitz to claim they ought not to?

And believe you me, the invading hordes Lazarowitz wishes for us to embrace are not SO stupid as to deny themselves some sort of power to determine who and what America shall be. And if the imbecile Lazarowitz won't claim some sort of self-determination regarding this great land, the invading hordes will gladly step in and show him how to do it.

Lazarowitz wants Americans to abdicate their unalieanble right to national self-determination to a group of outsiders who have no hesitation to force their self-determination on the citizens.

Lazarowitz is morally depraved. He says it is evil for one people to determine for themselves who they shall be but OKAY for another people to tell the others to FORCE on those people who they must become.

It is twisted and if not intentionally diabolical, then it is demented.

It is perverted justice. And it is communistic because everything we have inherited and built up as a "one people" is to be handed over to those whose ancestors did not toil for them. This is exactly like working all your life to help your children and when you have achieved your financial goals and adequate property it is demanded of you to bequeath it all to strangers' children.

This is communism when done on as large a scale as the insidious Mr. Lazarowitz would have us accept.

If the criminally-minded Mr. Lazarowitz is so worried about the Mexicans, he can send them all his money. Better yet, he go live with the barbarous hordes and try to tell them THEY have no right to self-determination.

Lazarowitz has advocated communism while pretending to be offended by socialism. What a jerk.

http://lewrockwell.com/lazarowitz/lazarowitz25.1.html

http://www.discoverchimpanzees.org/become/male_patrol.php

Sweden's Genocide

2011-04-22T02:55:00.000-07:00

April 22, 2011 A.D.

Patrick Buchanan wrote a book, nearly ten years ago, called The Death of the West. In it he chronicles the method: the immigration of third-world barbarians, the moral depravity of the native-born westerners, and the indifference and complicity of their leaders to allow the invasion of backwards civilizations.

It is a perfect storm of self-inflicted genocide by a people who hate themselves because they became a great civilization.

Below is a You Tube video about the suicidal genocide in Sweden. I don't know how much of it is true, but it rings true. France is having the same problem. The part about having an honest debate about immigration is crucial. Such a debate is not allowed by western governments, including the USA.

Americans are not allowed to discuss being made into a third-world dump. We are just to submit to our rulers and accept the genocide.

Those who want a robust debate are called racists and bigots; and the discussion ends. Self-determination is a vaunted value of the leftist global community (Wikipedia). But is strictly denied to western peoples. To be specific, white people.

They have no such right and their leaders make sure they don't. So follow the money. And follow the addiction to power. Western leaders become rich by selling off their nations to multiculturalism and the goal of one world government.

http://www.amazon.com/Death-West-Populations-Immigrant-Civilization/dp/0312302592/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1303467234&sr=8-1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-determination

Do Gooder White Liberals Spend Their Wealth On Non-Citizens While Americans Suffer

2011-03-25T13:34:00.000-07:00

March 25, 2011 A.D.

Rich white liberals spend a lot of money overseas on fruitless philanthropic projects to help others who are often not even willing to help themselves. One cannot help people from the ground up like the singer Madonna is doing in Malawi. The New York Times online has this article about her school in Malawi (or what is left of it before its collapse). The collapse may foreshadow the ultimate futility of her efforts.

Leaders of backwards nations must be willing to lift up their people and they cannot themselves be corrupt or such aid won't work. If this is not the case then rich foreigners end up throwing away their money. In many areas where lily-white liberals tend to go around the world (and we often get the feeling that it is to prove they are not racists) they are dealing in populations with low IQs. Liberals have to understand that IQ plays a serious role in explaining the circumstances of the down trodden and the leaders which come forth from among them. And it plays a role especially where education is concerned.

Herding children into schools isn't the only answer and in the beginning it isn't even the best one. IQ is something which cannot be easily changed and it predicts academic abilities. It takes generations to change. Other things have to be done before lavish funds should be appropriated for schools. Gaudy buildings and equipment in areas of the world with people not ready for anything resembling what the western nations view as adequate schools becomes an insult to these people. It is to embarrass them ultimately because they will not be able to achieve what Madonna hopes for them.

What they need first, and for many generations thereafter, is good nutrition and clean water. Good nutrition helps raise IQ levels. You simply cannot educate a rock and expect a flower to grow. You have to wait for some rich soil to appear first and that takes years of adequate and sustained nutrition. This should be her (or anyone who cares) focus. And since Madonna doesn't run Malawi, her efforts are likely futile.

After generations of good nutrition (good luck) you still won't need expensive schools to educate children in third world conditions. What a waste of money! Just send books. Send paper, pencils, and crayons. Send more books. Then some more. More paper. More books. Paper. Pencils. Then books.

But don't build an expensive school. That is stupid.

There has been centuries of missionary work by Christians in these down-trodden areas of the world long before Madonna noticed other peoples' suffering. And there has been decades of educating the best of young foreign nationals in Western schools who then return to their homelands. Yet little headway has been made in many areas of the world where the intellectual capacity of the citizens is problematic. Had rich liberals helped with this missionary work last century, which always focused on nutrition and clean water, things might have been better at this time for these unfortunate people.

But leftists like Madonna did virtually nothing (often condemning) to help American Christians in the field living side by side with the down-trodden while exposing themselves to many hardships, trials, and suffering. Had the rich liberals and leftists in America not been frothing Christophobic bigots and sat idly by while others reached out to help, things might be more fruitful for the Madonnas of the world.

I'm not saying Madonna is a bigot. She had a Catholic upbringing and now she is dabbling in Jewish mysticism. So she appears to be searching for the truth and I doubt she would attack Christianity.

But these leftist late-comers for the most part ignored the pleas of missionaries from the darkest corners of planet for nearly a century. And now they are just throwing good money at bad ideas. It's a crying shame and they should leave these matters to those already in the field working with the poor and unfortunate people in the undeveloped world.

There is much trouble in America and so many people in need. Yet one wonders why rich leftists like George Soros, Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, Peter Lewis, and John Kerry who became rich because of the blessings of liberty provided by this country waste their money overseas or waste it in political shenanigans at home. They don't rebuild crumbling infrastructure projects that need repair. They don't help old people with their health care. They don't start hospitals for the poor. Yes, they spend some of their wealth here, but they often piddle their money away overseas while their countrymen suffer.

Madonna couldn't help provide some old people in America with their health insurance? She couldn't purchase expensive medical equipment for handicapped Americans? She couldn't fund the building of a needed water purification or sanitation system in a poor area of the United States? There was no small bridge in a poor area of our country needing repair or rebuilding? Weren't there enough brown American faces to be photographed with to make her face appear even more white?

No rational person believes there wasn't a real need she could have met here in America--the land of her nativity--the country that gave her glory, honor, and wealth. Even if it flopped and buildings collapsed at least the money would have benefited some American somewhere.

Liberals love to prove they are not racists and that they don't have anything against dark people. Yet, for most all of Madonna's professional life she died her hair to look like a Nordic blond, eschewing her naturally dark feature.

Here is a link to a photo of "Madonna". Keep in mind, as you look at the photo, that she hopes to be remembered as a good mother. This, after she did everything in her power to debauch American youth. Other mothers were desperately trying to be good mothers while she undermined their every efforts to do so by her powerful personal media images that reached practically every innocent child in the country, including youths whose mothers would not let their children be a fan of Madonna.

It was weird, as I searched, how that the internet appears to be scrubbed of much of the filthy images Madonna spewed across the planet. Google Images have, generally, nice photos of Madonna as if she was a nice wholesome girl. There are some raunchy photos still, but not much of it. I reckon she might have spent a fortune putting her filthy images down the memory hole and, or, threatening folks with copyright lawsuits if they publish their personal photos of her.

At the peak of her career photos and videos of Madonna's raunchy and vile strutting on stage like a slut were ubiquitous and sent all over the planet and made every decent mother in America pull her hair out. These were average mothers who did not have have the wealth Madonna has to shield their children from the vile and sleazy brand of moral corruption Madonna peddled, and wallowed in, and exposed other mothers' children to.

She might redeem herself to her fellow countrymen, women,and children, by helping her own people in America--even the ones she helped debauch while stepping on them on her way to the top.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/25/us/25madonna.html?hp

http://www.odt.co.nz/entertainment/music/72298/madonna-wrapping-world-tour-israel

More slutty-like images of Madonna:

http://www.femalebeauty.info/2006/madonna-voted-the-worlds-greatest-sex-symbol.html

http://www.life.com/image/83617034

Genocide Chinese Style

2011-03-25T02:29:00.000-07:00

March 25, 2011 A.D.

There is a new Chinese breeding program here in the USA. It's the newest twist in modern genocide which the loathsome Hispanics have perfected (albeit in a more primitive fashion--intentionally sneaking across the border, living in the bush, then arrogantly begging for services at the nearest hospital in order to drop their load).

Our modern genocide in America is generally non-violent and getting more creative.

According to this article at MSNBC, Chinese women are coming to America to give birth to their babies so they can claim citizenship for them.

I'm surprised they didn't start a chain of these breeder birthing factories across the state of California with the blessing and assistance of the Democrats. But someone shut it down for "code violations".

If they get up to code will they open again?

And the genocide through immigration scheme keeps rolling along.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42252780/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/

GENOCIDE! GENOCIDE! GENOCIDE!

2011-02-25T18:24:00.000-08:00

February 25, 2011 A.D.

The US government's genocide of Americans of European descent speeds along courtesy the treasonous swine George Bush, John McCain, Ted Kennedy (dead), and various other criminal types coming from Ivy League schools like Barack Hussein Obama. And we read:

Looking at population projections for Texas, demographer Steve Murdock concludes: "It's basically over for Anglos." Two of every three Texas children are now non-Anglo and the trend line will become even more pronounced in the future, said Murdock, former U.S. Census Bureau director and now director of the Hobby Center for the Study of Texas at Rice University. " Houston Chronicle

Hispanics have virtually no loyalty to the United States because if they did they would be leading the way to ban Hispanics from immigrating to the USA. And if they don't ban it, then America becomes the lands they left behind: places they do not wish to live. We have enough of them. And Hispanics banning Hispanics is the only proof we have of their loyalty. And they have failed to prove it yet. Not even their service in the military proves their loyalty. That only proves their power as a fifth column. Anyone, Hispanic or not, welcoming more Hispanics to America intends to destroy her and is an enemy of the United States.

There will be an increase in crime and violence (they have a high crime rate and already are a high proportion of the populous) that only a totalitarian police state can curb. Think "Mexico". This what our leaders have brought down upon us. These are the kind of people our government has flooded the nation with. And this makes our leaders the greatest criminals America has ever known

We read:

"Unless the trend line changes, 30 percent of the state's [Texas] labor force will not have even a high school diploma by 2040, he said."

Our leaders are not only evil and stupid themselves and should be imprisoned for their rest of their lives for this genocide, but the invading hordes they have forced upon us will cause great suffering as they decrease the intellectual prowess of the United States of America for a half century or more should she survive.

UPDATE 3-1-11
Yesterday, Mike Gallagher devoted much of his show talking about this story from Texas. He did not add any original thoughts to the discussion. This is because he is a nitwit. At one point he asked if the story merely represented what a migration pattern looks like in a state (and so its not to worry)? No. That isn't it. What Murdock is talking about applies to the whole nation which is being swamped by tens and tens and tens of millions of fecund barbarians about as bad an immigrant group as one could find short of terrorists. I never heard him discuss the fifth-column threat these people pose as a massive immigrant group still lovingly devoted to their nearby former lands which are generally disgusting hell-holes. Mainly because they have lots of Hispanics in them.

http://blogs.chron.com/texaspolitics/archives/2011/02/texas_demograph.html

Greta Van Susteren, Multiculturalism, and Donald Trump

2011-02-24T13:07:00.000-08:00

February 24, 2011 A.D.

During the recent CPAC convention, Greta Van Susteren interviewed Donald Trump. He might run for President of the United States in 2012.

They did talk a little about immigration and during that time Greta revealed something of the big error in leftist thinking about diversity and multiculturalism. She hinted that the issue of immigration was good because it recognized other cultures--suggesting that it expands our understanding and so forth.

Yes, this is true. But that is not what is happening in America. OTHER cultures are being preferred over American civilization. We are not appreciating all cultures. We are destroying one: ours. And we are doing it by immigration. We started it with the culture war known as the sexual "revolution". And we are ending that war with an ethnic revolution which Greta ignorantly categorizes as a broad-minded appreciation of other peoples cultures.

To appreciate other cultures, one needs to board a vessel of some sort and go travel to other lands. Then one returns to ones own distinct culture. That is how to do it. What Greta considers as appreciation (i.e.our immigration status quo) of other cultures is anathema to appreciation of culture when it actually destroys one of them: ours.

To flood this nation with a tower of Babel is to make one less distinct culture exist on the planet. To overcome the distinct American culture and civilization with a mish-mash of disconnected and disunited people is to make the world less diverse because it eliminates a distinct member among all the diverse peoples.

What Greta foolishly and unthinkingly advocates in the effort to promote multiculturalism is a less multicultural planet, less one group: the distinctive American people.

Lawyers and people from Ivy League, Baby Ivies, and similar school tend to lead the way in this tragedy.

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Hispanic Americans: Traitors To America

2011-02-17T08:08:00.000-08:00

February 17, 2011 A.D.

There is one reason and only one reason why the United States of America is not able to secure its borders from invasion from foreign lands and terrorists: Naturalized Hispanic Americans and their American offspring.

If they had any brains they would be leading the effort to secure the border. If they had America's best interests at heart they would be crying out for a secure border. If they were loyal Americans they would call for profiling to remove illegals. But they do none of these things such that it would send a signal to the federal legislature to act on these issues with Hispanics blessings.

This is proof that Hispanics put their ethnicity ABOVE the security of the United States. It is incontrovertible evidence that the Hispanic people, as a group, are thoroughly unfit to become American citizens who ought to owe loyalty to the country and commitment to its survival. It is proof that they conduct themselves in a racist manner (subtly desiring to over run the USA with Hispanics and relegating whites to minority status).

What is the point of that? Then America would become like the places they escaped from.

It tells us they are a national security threat of the greatest domestic kind. And their failure to act, when it is obvious that America is suffering because of them, is proof that Hispanic Americans as a group are the worst immigrant group America has ever invited to its shores.

Not one more Hispanic immigrant to America. Not now. Not ever. They've had years to prove their loyalty. They failed.

Disloyal traitors all!

2011-02-05T16:01:00.000-08:00

February 5, 2011 A.D.

The (Daily) Mail online is reporting Prime Minister David Cameron's latest opinion about Muslim "extremism".

They quote Cameron:

"We need to be a lot less tolerant towards Islamic extremists..."

This is a good development, but not quite correct. All of Islam is extreme, not just the part the 'whips up hatred" of the West.

Why do I say all of Islam is extreme? I say it because it is inherent in Islam through the life of Mohammad, the original "extremist who led a military of tens of thousands that rampaged across Saudi Arabia robbing, stealing, raping, enslaving, killing, and subduing. They were doing this, not for the purpose of converting people to Islam, but for the purpose of Imperial conquest.

And all that Mohammad and his soldiers did or approved was and continues to be sacred and blessed according to the Koran. And all of it (except the number of wives a man may have) is to be emulated by Muslim adherents in perpetuity. Thus it is nigh unto criminal neglect, and certainly stupid, for Western nations, or any nation which cares about its survival, to let Muslims immigrate to their lands.

Of course, any policy for allowing the further immigration of Muslims to the United States is not only a direct genocidal attack against the native born population (who are greatly a Christian people), but a means to justify the Department of Homeland Security. The DHS is a proto-Stasi arm of the government run out of the White House that now regularly sexually molests innocent civilians at various transportation points.

If you are the government and want to sexually molest innocent women and children, and never got the opportunity to do it at your leisure without ending up in jail, you have to keep importing Muslims to provide you with the cover for doing it.

That is if you are a pervert or a despot.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1353902/David-Cameron-Stop-tolerating-Islamic-extremists-respect-British-core-values.html

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

Wired Online, American Genocide, and Education

2010-11-16T05:44:00.000-08:00

Wired online has an article up about math and science and American kids. They do poorly in comparison to "first world" countries. This is very old news.

Gee, why is that hard to imagine that when the first world has suddenly flooded its shores with third world populations things might be going badly in education? Flood your high IQ country with hundreds of millions of people with a significantly lower IQ than the native-born population and what do you get? Flood them with an immigrant group not interested in education and what do you get?

BETTER TEST SCORES OR WORSE TEST SCORES?

I'm playing the Jeopardy melody while I await the answer.

Those poor folks at Wired.

Don't they realize this was intentional? The Democrats, in general, and the Council on Foreign Relations, in particular (made up of Democrats and Republicans), WANTED to flood the country with low IQ types from nearby lands. How else could they destroy America (subvert the Constitution and become a Marxist Disney World) and at the same time please the Wall Street Journal and the US Chamber of Commerce?

The writer of the article notes:

The first stat of the study is the one in the header. 99% of U.S. teens believe math and science is important. This is all well and good, until you look at the stats beneath it. The most outstanding of these being the mere 10% that think that the U.S. is best when it comes to math and science.

Actually, this is a development. When I first started reading about education in America about twenty-five years ago a huge percentage of American students thought they were the cats-meow in academics, including math. But at that time they weren't. They were still at the bottom of the list. At least now they know they are poor students. That is important. It is better to know you are not well educated when you really are not than to believe you are well educated when you aren't.

But there's the problem of what to do about it. The author of the Wired article tells the kids to put down their game-pads, etc. Nice try, but the author should go sit in the corner and put on a dunce cap.

When Harold Stevenson and James Stigler did their ten year long study about the academic achievement of American, Chinese, Taiwanese, and Japanese students they discovered that American children and children in Japan or Taiwan spent about the same amount of time watching television. Yet American kids still did worse in school, especially in the upper grades, as they got into high school. Not so with Asian kids who watched a similar amount of TV and did well in school.

This study was done before video games, the internet, and all the little gadgets kids use nowadays to fill much of their free time. So I doubt that the time now spent by U.S. kids playing video games and the time spent by Japanese kids is much different than the time spent watching TV by U.S. kids and Asian kids back then. Both groups probably play a lot of video games today.

It is also unlikely that a culture of technophiles like the Japanese would produce students who play less video games and use gadgets less than American kids. Of all people, the folks at Wired know that the Japanese, in particular, lead the world in video gaming and equipment/gadget development. And they probably know Japanese kids are still sharp as tacks. There is no doubt that IQ and pedagogy effects this as well.

Yet, still, the article suggests more of the truth than what the author probably realizes.

Stevenson and Stigler noted in their ten year study, as summarized in their book, The Learning Gap, that the slower Asian students did have to come into school early and stay late if they got behind. In America, that doesn't happen. We all know it doesn't.

What does happen instead?

Here in America, the course material is dumbed-down instead so the not so smart kids can do their work within the same school period that the smart kids do it. They don't do this in Asian countries, instead they make the slower kids work LONGER each day with the SAME materials (Stevenson/Stigler). They do NOT dumb down the subject matter for the slower kids. They make them work harder at it. Ergo the higher overall test scores and academic achievement. Yes, there is also the higher Asian IQ factor, but even among the smarter folks overseas, the less smart are directed to higher goals, not lower ones.

But now that we have, since 1965, flooded the nation with hundreds of millions of low IQ students from third world areas of the world we have tens upon tens of millions of students who would need to spend more time in school learning the same subject matter that higher IQ students (predominantly Caucasian and Asians) learn in less time.

And IF WE WERE TO FOLLOW THE EXAMPLE OF THE BEST METHODS we see in Japan, Taiwan, Korea, Singapore, and China that would mean certain ethnic groups would be more represented among the students who need to spend more time in school. (Notice the push for longer and longer school days and school week). This is the only way to compensate for the appearance of racial discrimination. The bright kids will be forced to attend school longer than they need, regardless of race. This is not how the Asians do it though they do have a longer school year. But the slower kids have it even longer.

Though there would certainly be Caucasians and Asians who would need extra time in school as well, it would at this time in history be mostly immigrant groups from south of our border and blacks. We are dealing with averages here, not all from every group fits into these categories.

In Asia, the slower kids come in earlier and, or, stay later but all the children belong to the same ethnic and racial group so the extra time spent is determined by ability (you cannot "see" any difference in the children from the outside). So the "discrimination" is by academic level and it doesn't LOOK racist.

So if we try to do that America, it LOOKS racist, but it would not be. It may be racial, but it is not racist. It has a large racial component because of the racial mix in America which does not exist in homogeneous Asian countries and because IQ is a genetic component of race. There are other factors such as culture or poverty.

You must remember that when the Jews first came to this country in large immigrant waves they lived in poor areas of the same cities where blacks and other non-white groups now cluster. But they soon rose out of their poverty. That was largely because of their inherent intellectual gifts and also, importantly, because of their solid cultural customs and traditions which also included a major emphasis on education.

Some of this was missing in the black community. They also had been mistreated by whites. Jews had been mistreated similarly in the past in other places of the world. But they overcame their oppression by their customs, traditions, emphasis on eduction, intelligence and so forth. And if you think that is not fair, relax. The smartest IQ group in the world is the Ashkenazim Jews. They are almost extinct. Not that this is a good thing, of course. It's not good. But it indicates that high levels of intelligence may not be a gift but a curse. There is more to survival than intelligence.

It's complicated indeed.

Before the Democrats/liberals/progressives/Marxists tampered with the black family it was making significant advancements in America. Democrats destroyed this through welfare handouts, through abortion, and with illiteracy.

Before the Great Society, blacks mostly had intact families (a key to prosperity), owned businesses, and attended schools and colleges in greater numbers. It wasn't until the Marxist Democrats began using them as tools for destroying America (bribing them with other peoples money and trampling the Constitution to do it), that the black family (and education) fell apart. Education is still hit or miss with a large percentage of illiterate black males having been in jail or prison.

Illiteracy is a huge predictor of criminality. And black illiteracy is a direct result of policies promoted by the white elites in the Democratic Party and its members who belong to the education establishment. They have essentially condemned black men and youths to jail by denying them an education, even when blacks attended school long enough to have taken reading instructions.

A competent healthy child of average intelligence can learn to read by the end of first grade. Virtually every black child in America has attended school through the first grade. The only reason they didn't learn to read is because white Democrats/Liberals/Progressives insisted on Whole Language (and white Republicans fought it every step of the way).

So to cope with so great an influx of immigrant populations from low IQ zones and cultures which do not highly value education like we do here in America (except if you are a Democrat politician or teacher union member), it appears we would have to discriminate against the slower students from these groups by making them come into school for longer periods of time than most Caucasians and Asians.

The Marxists who run the education establishment don't want to appear to offend the immigrants (especially those from the largest group) even though they really don't care about them in any meaningful way. So they dumb down the whole education system instead. The kids of these white Democratic Party elites make it to the top of the pile, no matter what. So it doesn't matter to them if the whole system was dumbed-down for everyone's kids; their kids won't suffer. Just the poor kids do. Even and especially poor white kids (as they grow up they pay the greater tax burder, that is until they become the minority race here in America).

Thus the Democrats pacify the blacks by entitlements and Affirmative Action to balance it all out for good measure. Whites, even poorer whites, pay for it.

This is why putting down game-control pads and iPods won't work even for the brightest kids. If there is no challenging curricula for everyone to aspire to it won't matter if they all spend more time in school. The brightest kids will just do crafts, or sports, or volunteer work to help poor non-white people who will ultimately turn around and destroy them someday. It always happens that the intellects are murdered by the masses anyway when the Marxists tamper with "society" in their quest for the unachievable fraud called "social" justice (as if justice alone isn't adequate) and the tyranny of absolute equality of material status. In our case it will be racial as well (especially since white liberals have nurtured racial hatred of whites). I know, it sounds crazy. And it is. But white liberals do this to achieve power for themselves. And for them, power matters more than the genocide of whites in America.

U.S. educators sensed this obvious appearance of discrimination long ago. This is why they didn't make blacks (or any slow students of any color) come in early or stay late. Though it isn't racial, leftists perceived that it would be seen that way. This is because leftists in America are racists. Just look at what they did to American blacks. They got them aborted at a higher rate than whites and destroyed the black family. Not making them do their schoolwork helped destroy blacks.

They instinctively deemed it unfair to make the slower kids spend more time at school (like the Asians do with their ethnically homogeneous kids). And so instead of making the U.S. slow kids work LONGER each day to keep up with the bright kids the U.S. education establishment dumbed-down the curricula for everyone including the smart kids. That way they could avoid charges of racial discrimination. Of course, they would be the only charging themselves with it. In this way the slower kids (with a lower percentage of Asians and whites) could do their work in the same amount of time that the smart kids could and the Marxist thugs who run the system could seem to be virtuous and wise, though they are not.

Then the smart kids, who get their work done quickly to boot, are sent off to take AP classes which are generally just baby-sitting arrangements for bright students wherein nothing or little intellectually goes on. No doubt the smart kids feel they have already done all the smart things needed to be done for that day anyway and would feel that any more smart activities would be more of a punishment. In a sense it is. And these kids arrived at this conclusion because they are smart.

So they must cool their heels while the slow kids catch up. But they don't catch up to the same level. They catch up to a PASSING level of an already dumb-down curriculum. Whereas the slower ethnically and genetically homogeneous Asians kids catch up to the really smart kids; everyone consuming a superior body of academic materials along the way, but the not so smart kids simply taking longer to do it.

You didn't know this before. I know that. Otherwise America would solve the problem overnight by instituting a proven curricula. Like the curricula of Calvert school. More about that later.

The education establishment, the Democrats, and the mainstream media do not want you to know how easy it is to turn this around. It would cost them money and they are all about money and how that it should go to them.

I think American educators are generally envious and threatened by intelligent students. I think they were poor students themselves and have it out for bright kids. They have an ax to grind. They want bright kids brought down. It's personal. They don't want them to get any smarter, they don't want them to get any smarter than themselves--the teachers. Teachers rank at the bottom academically in testing at the college level. According to Thomas Sowell PhD:

In 1980-81, students majoring in education scored lower on both verbal and quantitative SATs than students majoring in art, music, theatre, the behavioral sciences, physical sciences, or biological sciences, business or commerce, engineering, mathematics, the humanities, or health occupations. Undergraduate business and commercial majors have long been regarded as being of low quality, but they still edged out education majors on both parts of the SAT. Engineering students tend to be lopsidedly better mathematically than verbally, but nevertheless their verbal scores exceed those of education majors, just as art and theatre majors had higher mathematics scores than education majors. Not only have education students' test scores been low, they have also been declining over time. As of the academic year 1972-73, the average verbal SAT score for high school students choosing education as their intended college major was 481--and by academic year 1979-80, this had declined to 389. (Inside American Education, 1993, Hardback, p 25).

If you are comparing SAT scores of the college education students of today with college education students before 2006 (about that time), remember that an SAT test score of 1600 today, would have been a score of 1500 before the change (before they cheated). They dumbed-down that test (for all students) too because of all the complaints about how stupid our kids seem to be these days. Notice how well it worked? Parents don't whine about it any more. In fact, they have so muddied the SAT waters that you cannot easily compare student scores from generation to generation. They don't want you to keep track of their incompetence. But they cannot hide from the international testing. It exposes them.

It's a fine game these educators play.

There is a reason why a Nobel Prize winning chemist could never teach in an American High School if he or she didn't have a teachers certificate. Poorly educated teachers would lose their jobs if intelligent people applied for teaching jobs without teacher certification. Teacher certification is a jobs program scheme for fairly stupid people who want to teach other peoples' kids at school without having to compete with really smart adults who know more than the teachers.

So the Wired article seems to just skim the surface of this topic.

That 10% of the students surveyed who thought that U.S. students did good in math and science is really way down from the last set of stats I saw on this (I'll try to find those numbers). But that is good because the kids before had an unrealistic image of themselves. Whereas now they appear to have a more truthful one: that they are bad in math and science.

Now if we could only get to the problem.

That won't happen with leftists running things. They are insane, deranged, demented, and evil. Marxists always are. And these folks run U.S. education. If they want to fix the system, they simply need to use a good curriculum. The curriculum is the key. It is not about classroom size (Stevenson/Stigler), it is not about fancy materials in the classroom (Stevenson/Stigler), and it is not about expensive school buildings (Stevenson/Stigler).

IT IS ABOUT CURRICULA.

As Charles Sykes pointed out in his book Dumbing Down Our Kids, it's the curriculum. And I'll say it this way: It's the Curriculum Stupid.

According to Skyes, Johns Hopkins monitored a study in which the curricula of a distinguished private school (Calvert in Baltimore, Maryland) was plopped down into the classrooms of an inner city school in Baltimore called Barclay (Sykes p 278).

Nothing about the lives of the students changed. They had the same parents, siblings. houses, apartments, awful housing developments, bad neighborhoods, and marginal teachers. They had the same poverty and disadvantages.

The only change was the curricula.

What happened?

I'll quote Sykes:

...the plan to incorporate the Calvert curriculum into Barclay in early 1990...was implemented in the following fall...Three years later, Barclay had been transformed into a national model. An evaluation by researchers from John Hopkins University found that the program 'has produced significant changes in the ethos of the K-3 classes and the entire elementary floor of Barclay School. The classes and halls are more orderly; the students seem more focused on academics ... Students attendance was up and achievement, as measured both by the district's standardized tests and the Calvert-administered Educational Records Bureau (ERB) test were also up significantly. The Johns Hopkins evaluation singled out student writing, where they found improvements to be 'particularly striking.' On reading tests, the mean scores of first and third graders in 1993 were more than twenty percentage points above the national mean. In the second and third grades, Barclay students scored above the sixtieth percentile on the ERB writing skills tests. Before the Calvert program had been introduced, none of the same-grade groups at Barclay had scored above the forty-seventh percentile. Math scores were also up at Barclay. (Sykes p 278)

Well isn't that utterly amazing? Why wasn't this broadcast throughout the land and immediately instituted in our schools?

Let me suggest why.

Sykes writes:

There are other measures of success as well. In April 1994, Educations Week reported that twenty children at Barclay who had been designated as 'severe' under the Chapter 1 compensatory education program had made so much progress that they were now classified as 'gifted and talented.

Well, you cannot have that.

You cannot have disadvantaged "minority" children really learning things so easily in U.S. public schools. Then you might not need the Federal government trying to run things. Then you might not need more teachers. Or higher pay for teachers. Or more schools. Or fewer students per classroom (Stevenson and Stigler suggest that higher students per class might be better). Or more powerful union thugs.

The education racket might not be such an unmanageable juggernaut if fixing the problems were so easy. And the racket cannot face that. More experts couldn't be hired, more children couldn't be drugged into a stupor, more brainwashing kids into becoming good little Marxist pigs couldn't occur.

That won't be allowed. It won't be tolerated!

You might say, well, those Marxist pigs pigs overseas do have some bright students. Indeed they do. But their people have already been subjugated. And they are darn serious about educating them (to take over the world, of course). The Marxists here have to destroy freedom first. Then they will compete with their fellow Marxists like the Russians and the Chinese do with each other.

The white leftist liberal/progressives who have owned the U.S government schools for over a half century won't allow excellence in education when it might be used for the purposes of liberty, freedom, and free enterprise. You can be sure of that.

It is mainly conservatives, Christians, and Republicans who have sought to bring about the educations changes that were needed. They have worked on the problem for decades. They recognized what worked and didn't, but the left refused to cooperate. At the same time the Barclay project research came in, American students nationwide were suffering from decades of white liberal/progressive education experiments like the fraudulent Whole Language system and New New Math programs.

They were utter failures and generations of children were defrauded of their intellectual promise and their economic futures. Black children especially, because of white liberal progressive Democrat leftists, were plunged into deep intellectual darkness. They graduated from school without learning to read. Or they left school at higher rates altogether as they fell further and further behind because they could not read because leftist Democratic Party educators made sure they didn't by abandoning phonics.

The only option many of these defrauded persons had was crime. The majority of criminals in federal prison are completely or functionally illiterate. They are the direct result of white, liberal-progressive Democrats who experimented on other peoples children with phony and unproven educational methods.

All of it was done with fierce opposition by parents and Republicans.

The white liberal progressive Democrats destroyed their lives. No wonder they feel guilty and try to bribe blacks with welfare handouts. Look at what they did to them!

Right-wingers lost the education battle. They fought valiantly. Chester Finn, Diane Ravitch, Thomas Sowell, Charles Sykes, Phyllis Schlafly, and many more. Bill Bennett led the charge on that fight long ago and realized that the education establishment could not be stopped.

It still hasn't been stopped. This has been a century long battle that was established at the highest levels of academia at the turn of the last century. Then John Dewey and the Progressive Education movement took over. It has been down hill ever since.

Bill Bennett wound up resigning to the fact that this monolithic monster was unstoppable. He ended up just calling it "The Blob". There isn't a more apt description of it as a meaningless, unintelligent, pervasive, gooey nothing that slimes everything in its path and makes life miserable.

Now, the only thing a deceit American can hope for in American education is for the public system to be abolished or collapse. Schooling should go back to families, neighborhoods, and communities. People should be responsible for the education of their own children or they should not have them.

Private schools and home schooling could suffice. The government has proven it has failed to serve the nation's children. It had over half a century to prove itself. And it has abused its privilege. They have abused our children. They have molested their minds, defrauded their diplomas, and corrupted their consciences. Our government schools are now soviet-style police-state Marxist brainwashing factories that must be destroyed.

Attendance at school is by gun-point is un-American. It is fascist.

Thankfully, there are still options to the police-state schools. For now. But they come with a high price.

We've come too far, the public schools cannot be reformed. They should not be anymore because they are tools of the fascist totalitarian police-state. They must be destroyed by defunding them at the state and federal levels. Return them to their homes and neighborhoods. Perhaps even their cities.

It is the only thing a moral and free people would do. A just, free, and virtuous people do not force other peoples children to school at gunpoint. It's over. The big dream is dead. Let's bury it.

Turn your chairs over and place them on top of your desk so the janitor can sweep the floor and, please, turn off the lights before you leave.

http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2010/11/study-99-of-u-s-teens-believe-math-and-science-are-important/

Geraldo Rivera: Fox News's Token Genocide Advocate

2010-10-29T05:13:00.000-07:00

Yes, it appears to be true.

Fox News, which has usually used Geraldo Rivera for covering marginal stories, or stories from our soldiers in the field, seems now have more camera time for putting a happy face on the genocide of Americans of European descent. Whether or not the uppity-ups at Fox understand this, I don't know. But when Geraldo is on camera, you should always expect him to weave pro-genocide viewpoints into his comments.

Geraldo appears to be Fox News's official spokesman for and promoter of white protestant genocide in America (especially the kind that uses non-white Catholic latinos/Hispanics).

This puts Geraldo clearly in the brown-supremacist camp of American politics. Stupid evil white people (I'm white, so don't get the wrong idea) need to learn that it is wrong for whites to gather in one country. This won't do. Therefore whites must be broken up and moved along like a bunch of loiterers gathered together on a street corner.

Oh, and, never mind that whites are a minority race worldwide. That will not help you stop the genocide. This is about putting whitey in his place.

Whites do not deserve a continent, nor do they deserve the ones they have founded and found themselves to reside in. Not here, not in Europe, nor in Australia, or anywhere they may gather. Only non-whites may cluster and gather in continents.

Did I say "whites"? Ouch, is that a swear word? I think so. But I'm not going to apologize for using it

This happy face put on the talk about genocide is like a rapist trying to get his victim to relax and enjoy it.

Well, isn't that special? (You Tube)

I noticed "Gerry" (can I call him that?) has been given much more latitude in discussing "Latino" issues in Fox. For example, today he said Tom Tancredo is a radical. Oh, that must be bad. They should have played some scary evil music along with that comment. I presume that Gerry thinks Tancredo is a radical because he opposes the genocide of whites in America and to not be a radical you have to support the genocide especially where Latinos are concerned.

Anyway, the implication was, as I saw it, that Tom is a bad man because he appears to be ethnocentric. Naturally, Gerry's viewpoint is always ethnocentric for his group, but that is OKAY because it is about brown folks. Evil white folks are not afforded the same attitude. And the brown folks say so.

This is the point where you white trash are supposed to salute, or bow down, submit yourselves, and eat dirt.

Brian Kilmeade, also of Fox News, has even gotten into the act. A few weeks ago he--the sports reporter--babbled on about the need for foreign doctors because, it is alleged, we have a shortage of our own. Brian told the audience that it doesn't matter what their nationality is, just bring them in, we need them!

I heard no talk from Kilmeade, though, about the problem of having doctors who can hardly speak English doing surgery on us. No talk about bringing in doctors who are not interested in embracing our American culture. No talk about preserving our character as a people through immigration. Just bring them in even if they cannot stand us because Brian has a problem.

Maybe Brian needs a "pee-pee" doctor? "Pee-pee" is the word Gerry used this morning to describe the penises of brave US soldiers in the military. It seems, as our intrepid reporter reported, that our soldiers are way too smooth to care about showering with homosexuals.

I must say that it may be absolutely necessary for Gerry to have to refer to his own member as a pee-pee, but I don't think a guy (I hesitate to refer to Gerry as a man) who interviews tough Marines ought to be calling their privates a "pee-pee", a wee-wee, a tinky-winky, or any other other demeaning term a Hispanic guy might wish to characterize mostly white tough guys as having.

This is like a white guy calling a mostly black group of men "boys". Do it in front them, Gerry, and then also tell them you support the genocide of whites in America through immigration. That is, if you have the guts to do it.

Criticism for unfortunate racial or ethnic blunders, even perceived ones, for the most part run only one way these days: against whites.

Perhaps Kilmeade has to grovel like this these days because of some poorly worded comments he made in the past about race. Read about that here at Wikipedia. The article uses the word "racism" as a category to describe some of Kilmeade's comments which only a loon would think were racist.

Let me quote from it in case it is taken down (which it should be, but probably won't be) :

"Racism remark

On July 8, 2009, Kilmeade and two co-hosts were discussing a study that, based on research done in Finland and Sweden, showed people who stay married are less likely to suffer from Alzheimer's disease. Kilmeade commented, '[In the United States] we keep marrying other species and other ethnics...'. Ignoring attempts by co-host Gretchen Carlson to interrupt him, he added, 'See, the problem is the Swedes have pure genes. Because they marry other Swedes .... Finns marry other Finns, so they have a pure society. In America we marry everybody, we marry Italians and Irish.'^[3]"

(The words "Racism remark" were in bold lettering at the Wikipedia website). Oddly, copying and pasting did not work or was not allowed by eBlogger. So you see funny little lighthouses before the words Finland Sweden, and etc., and the sentences are chopped up. Where these little lighthouses are is were the hyperlinks in the Wiki article were. I've left it as it appears to show you that it is a an original copy/paste section. But if you read from quote mark to quote mark, you have the verbal conversation as it was originally.)

The first word of the above quote is the word "racism", and it is copied directly from the Wikipedia website. You have to be silly or dumb to call what he said racism. It may have been inaccurate, but it isn't racism. We can all be adults and talk about racial differences without accusing each other of racism. His theory may be off, or he said something stupidly, but no one in their right mind thinks Brian is a racist.

It is a general rule of the genociders that white people are always assumed to be racists just because they are white and non-whites are always presumed to be innocent of racism just because they are brown or black. Truly, white liberals were the first to advance this theory. Perhaps they are driven to this madness because somewhere in their youth Aunt Mildred or Uncle Wilbur used the N word and white liberals hate themselves for it.

And Aunt Mildred.

Now the rest of us have to suffer because of Aunt Mildred.

Always remember, only white folks are not allowed to make poorly worded comments about race. Or at least white folks are not even allowed to seem to make poorly worded comments.

Therefore Kilmeade gets trash-talked by Wikipedia.

Aw shucks, why don't we bring in doctors from cultures which do female genital mutilation. Maybe Megyn Kelly needs to schedule a surgery? Who knows! Anything goes!

Let's mix things up real good.

Genocide Gerry could help.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmwqnqL3Hbg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Kilmeade

Big Sis And Criminal Alien Deportations

2010-10-14T09:04:00.000-07:00

It looks responsible. The US government under the Obama administration and Department of Homeland Security might have a better record of deporting criminal aliens than the previous administration of the genocidal maniac, George Bush.

Patrick Buchanan, who opposes the status quo US immigration policy, is reporting favorably on the Obama administration's good record of deportation. Here is his article at American Conservative Magazine online. The title of the article is "Is Big Sis One Of Us"?

Is she like those who support patriotic immigration? I think we can safely say she is not. No Democrat can be. They need the influx of ignorant disloyal barbarians to help them abolish America as we have known her and so deporting them all isn't going to help Democrats. We already know the president supports amnesty, so this isn't a patriotic act by the Obama administration.

Then what is it?

Besides reducing the plague of crime, its racial. Blacks and Hispanics don't get along very well in prison. And prison is the place where most of the deported would have headed. There are a lot of blacks in prison. And so it is likely that the president is protecting the large black population of men in prison from the extremely violent and clannish Hispanics who like to assault blacks. The since blacks have always abused whites in prison (they like to rape them whereas whites almost never rape the blacks), it appears blacks are getting their comeuppance. And so the president is going to step in to help his brothers (mind you Christians are supposed to be his brothers, but I assure you, the president doesn't love me like his loves blacks). I'm white. I'm the bad guy just because I'm white even though I share more with the president because we are supposed to both be Christians, than he ever will with any black who is not a Christian.

You can be fairly sure if whites were more threatened in prison by the Hispanic criminals, Obama would be stuffing US prisons with every last criminal Hispanic he could find.

That's our dear Barry! Racial preferences and revenge to the bitter end!

We have seen the president unfairly protect blacks before (Pajamas Media). The [in]justice department refused to prosecute blacks thugs who were intimidating voters during the 2008 election (You Tube).

Big Sis is just the big enabler of these racist thugs. She needs to find some honest work and hope history will portray her as something other than a diabolical henchman.

http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2010/10/11/janet-the-deporter/

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/american-hero-coates-negates-a-year-of-justice-department-spin-on-new-black-panther-case/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU

Obama's Aunt:

2010-09-21T07:16:00.000-07:00

Parasite:

1. a person who exploits the hospitality of the rich and earns welcome by flattery

2. an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism

3. something that resembles a biological parasite in dependence on something else for existence in support without making useful or adequate return

Merriam-Webster Dictionary online

In a recent segment on the Mike Gallagher show, Mike Scinto ran audio clips of President Obama's Aunt talking about the handouts she accepted from government welfare institutions in the US.

Obama's Aunt lives freely in America and has sponged off the tax payer ever since she entered the country and remained here illegally. It is genocide to intentionally flood the nation with foreigners who undermine the customs, traditions, race, and religion of the native born population. Obama's Aunt is just one such example. And the illegal barbarian invaders Obama wants to to let in through amnesty are the rest of it.

She is essentially like a thief who is stealing money from others. Because other thieves gave her this money does not excuse her guilt. When it was pointed out to her that she may have taken ill-gotten gains, she showed no understanding of it. She is depraved.

Furthermore, she appears so stupid as to believe that other people exist somewhere in the universe to give her free things she has no right too. This stupidity appears to run in her family. Her nephew, our president, actually thinks someone has to pay for a tax cut. It is as if the cut money doesn't belong to the owner in the first place. What our moronic president actually meant was: who would pay for the Marxist welfare-queen slavery programs the Democrats have saddled the tax payer with?

We don't need more stupid people like Obama's Aunt since we already have enough of them in the Democratic and Republican parties.

None of this squares with what being an American is. Her criminally-minded attitude and contempt for the American tax payer who she thinks, apparently, owes her a livelihood proves she is unfit to be an immigrant American. My immigrant relatives didn't come here and sponge off of others. This is because they had morals. They weren't criminally-minded people like Obama's Aunt.

According to the recent television interview which Scinto played on Mike's radio show today, she has no qualms about taking this money from the American people. She is unashamed. She has no remorse. She bears no guilt. And she essentially said so. During the interview, she learned about the possibility that she has received something she ought not to receive. But she never indicated or acknowledged that she has an obligation to repay her debt to the American people.

In her mind, she must feel she is owed. But she could only feel this because she is a disreputable and immoral person.

She was ordered out of this country previously by a US court and then the same judge changed his mind and let her to stay. He changed his mind about her status about the SAME TIME her dangerous, extremist, and subversive Marxist nephew, Barack Obama, was on the threshold of stepping up to run the nation. All of this is criminally-minded in nature.

And it is all in keeping with the continued genocide of white and protestant Americans. Not only are they being quickly replaced by non-white foreigners with barbaric and immoral customs, they are even be forced to fund these lazy greedy barbarians who are not fit to care for themselves or their offspring once they get here. This further stresses the native born citizens who must not only bear their own sufferings but those of others but become unable to grow their own families.

All of this is done at the point of gun by government thugs and criminally-minded types in Washington who pretend"serve" the American people in congress and the White House, but are actually destroying them and replacing them with foreigners too stupid to know what being an American means.

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

US Government Exposes American Children To Terror

2010-09-20T06:31:00.000-07:00

According to International Law, a government's intentional acts to eliminate a religion and replace it with another one (completely or in part) is genocide.

US government leaders, since 1965, are not only intentionally eliminating the white race in America by various incremental steps (down from about 90 percent of the population to, soon, less than fifty percent), but it is also intentionally destroying its Protestant nature which has existed since its inception. You might be scoffing at this point and thinking "why would they do that?"

I will tell you why.

They are doing it because of the Council on Foreign Relations. The CFR runs America and it is its goal to destroy the nation-state and national sovereignty all over the world, beginning here in the USA. But before that can happen world-wide, the most powerful nation (the USA) has to be brought down. They have to attack, especially, white protestants to do it. They are doing a "good" job so far, are they not?

The reason the CFR wants this to happen is so that CFR members (their children and family members) can run, or at least help run, the world. It isn't enough that they run America, they want more. This is about power. But they cannot run the world or be high level operatives in running it if America remains powerful; it must be leveled. Loyal rank and file Americans (commoners) stand in the way of their quest for world power. These loyal Americans must somehow be eliminated. Immigration is the latest and most effective weapon. Ted Kennedy laid this foundation.

These disloyal and traitorous power mongers are exemplified by the Bush, McCain, Clinton, and Kerry families. All belong to the CFR. This is not a conspiracy in the traditional sense since the goal of the CFR has been made public. But there is a conspiracy to keep the deliberations of their meetings a secret. Members swear an oath to it.

Our government's genocide of protestants, in particular, is being orchestrated mostly with the invasion of Catholic barbarian races from the south (tens and tens and tens of millions of them with a high birth and crime rate, and little education or the desire for it). I'm sorry, I have no hatred for these people, but barbarians do have certain characteristics and historians have always said so. The apostle Paul said that he was indebted to the barbarians of his age. And I agree with him about ours. Nonetheless, God has established the nations for a purpose. And one of the obvious purposes (as evidenced by 6,000 years of recorded history) is to give humanity a variety of peoples and governments organized in smaller groups.

Indeed, multiculturalism (which is often leftist code for: multiracialism) within a nation destroys the racial diversity of the human race as the different races blend together. Today, the only large racial group that is being destroyed by multicultural racism is the white race (a minority race world-wide). This is intentional.

I'm not necessarily opposed to the watering down of any race if people as individuals or groups wish for it, but Americans are not wishing that America becomes non-white; this is being forced on them against their will. It is therefore genocide since the government knows what is happening and it continues to promote it despite the evidence that it is occurring and the victims opposition to it. The CFR lobbies for this genocide with their support of high rates of non-white immigration, among other things.

According to the Bible, believers in heaven are represented before the throne of God as nations, tribes, peoples, and tongues (languages). These distinctions apparently please God who also tells us that all men and women are of the same blood. They are the same species and Christ died for all of them who believe in Him, no matter their genotype or race. But the diverse distinctions among human groups seems to please the Almighty as much as the diverse distinctions among even the birds and fish He created. Clearly, human history is the evidence that the distinctions among mankind are as much a natural feature as the distinctions among the birds and all other lower creature groups.

We know that blacks and other racial groups are themselves not ashamed of their own genotype and are even happy about it. It seems only some whites (leftist whites) are ashamed of their genotype. Apparently they hate themselves. These whites appear to delight in watering down the white race by overwhelming it through immigration of non-whites. Then they excoriate whites who don't agree with their genocidal/suicidal mental disorder. Unfortunately this is also the stance of our current president. And it was certainly the stance of our former president, George Bush, who was and is by-the-way, an unmitigated imbecile.

Besides the racial genocide/suicide by the US government through immigration, a protestant genocide is occurring by flooding the country with Catholic Latinos from South America.

And now, in addition to the Catholic assault on protestantism via the government, it has turned to using Muslims. This group of religious persons, who have as legendary a violent record of persecution as the Catholics, have subjugated Christians for over a millennium. But, unlike the Catholics, the Muslims continue to attack Christians (and anyone else who disagrees with them) all over the world.

Oddly enough, the (Catholic) Crusades were a response (defense) to the attacks by Muslims who had violently taken over large Christian territories in the Middle East (they are all now mostly gone with Lebanon being the last Christian territory to fall to Muslims in very recent times).

It is doubtful that most Muslims even understand the difference between a Catholic, Protestant, or Baptist (true Baptists do not number themselves among the Protestants). Nevertheless, the city of Istanbul still stands as a monument to their commitment to overcome others.. Their presence in Istanbul is symbolic of how far, geographically, the violent Muslim imperialist have gotten in their Jihad against those who profess Christ (or think they do) and dwell within Western territories.

The US government now conspires to assist Muslims in their ancient persecutions by letting them immigrate and visit our land. Before they arrived we had no terrorism as it exists here now and yet government continues to allow foreign Muslims in.

Obliviously, the US government wants us to be attacked or they would bar the door to these violent intolerant people. Clearly government wants us to cower in fear or they would stop Muslim entry. It is obvious that they need Muslims here as a pretext for the totalitarian growth of the police-state which government officials benefit from from monetarily. By and large both parties continue to support Muslim migration.

And now the government is even forcing American children to submit to Islam through the public schools.

Andrew Breitbart's website Big Journalism is reporting a story about a government school taking children to a Mosque and subjecting them to Muslim proselytizing, propaganda, discrimination, subjugation, and intimidation. Here is the link Breitbart's site provides.

The article says that the government school apologized. But I doubt they apologized for discriminating against the females in the group who were segregated from the boys for religious purposes, or for violating the rights of a Jewish boy not be subjected before a religion that still says god turned some Jews into apes and pigs. I doubt they apologized that the Koran honored at that Mosque advocates sexual slavery of females should Muslims capture them in war. It appears to be too much for the imbeciles in government to check out the Koran and its adherents before they subject American children to them.

I doubt the ignorant officials at Wellesley even know what the boys may have ignorantly agreed to by participating in the Muslim prayers. If I have Islam correct, by saying a few brief particular words, it is all that is required to be a Muslim. And if these boys said those particular words, they are, according to the Koran, Muslims for the rest of their lives. Someone needs to find out what those words, if any, were. And then someone needs to inform the boys' parents what the ramifications are for their sons.

These children, by law, must attend a school. They have no choice. And to force them into schools which force Islam down their throats is part of the government's genocidal attack on Americans. this is happening in various places all over the country and not just this one stupid government school.

Here is the clip from the field trip, with commentary:

http://www.wickedlocal.com/wellesley/news/x1869671749/Wellesley-superintendent-apologizes-for-letting-students-on-field-trip-pray-at-Islamic-mosque

Immigrant Arianna Huffington Stabs Americans In the Back

2010-09-15T06:24:00.000-07:00

It is one thing for idiotic Democrats to continually stab Americans in the back with high immigration rates, Marxism, a Maoist cultural revolution, the growth of the police-state and so forth, and a whole other thing for an uppity immigrant hag to do it.

Arianna Huffington, a leftist elitist who runs the online website called The Huffington Post, went too far in a recent interview with Maria Bartiroma on C-Span. Huff is promoting her new book Third World America. After listening to her I believe she is also promoting a third-world America.

Starting about the 21 minute mark she sets up her brutal and vicious attack on Americans. She says (beginning about the 21:30 mark) that

"innovation is absolutely key here".

Okay, I buy that.

But then she criticizes the "effort at the moment to restrict skilled immigrants from coming to this country".

She says we need more skilled labor immigrants. Apparently Americans are bumbling boobs too stupid or too inferior to get skills. So instead of the public schools training American kids, we should bring in foreign skilled labor because they will CREATE jobs which our stupid American kids are just too darn stupid to create for themselves.

Skilled business men and women (who may also possess superior labor skills) create jobs and we already have enough of these people.

What we need are manufacturers in country. Some manufacturing remains, but much has gone offshore, and we need it to do business here. We need to bring it home and stop over taxing it. Skilled American workers need the ability to start their own business on the shoe-string without aid from government . To do that there has to be less regulation of small businesses. This over regulation usually comes from idiotic leftists like Huff.

Democrats are currently strangling the shoe-string operation in the cradle. These shoe-string operations are the foundation of small businesses; importing skilled immigrants isn't. Dems strangle small operations with local, state, and federal laws and it becomes next to impossible to start them up. These small operations have been the backbone of independence and prosperity for individual Americans since our founding. But Huff implies we American workers are too stupid to do this anymore, and need superior OTHERS from overseas to come here and do it for us.

Get lost you foreign pond scum. Please.

The problem isn't the lack of skilled Americans. And if it was it would be because of leftists jerks who run the public schools. The problem has more to do with ruthless hags like Huffington who insults American workers, tells them to go volunteer somewhere and while they have their backs turned, stabs them in the back by advocating bringing in foreign workers to take any paying jobs that might pop up along the way while they are too busy donating their time working for free and needing to beg for food since they cannot start up a business for themselves because sapheads like Huff join up with those who make oppressive regulations over start-up businesses.

What it looks like is Huff appears to be advocating creating a beggar class out of native born Americans so that foreigners (like her, I guess) can come over and rake in the money.

About the end of the 23 minute mark she tells us that foreign visitors come to our country, get college educated, and then we ask them to leave. She says they should stay. Why should they stay? Well, I guess it is because our citizens who already have an education and college degrees, but don't have jobs, are going to be too busy volunteering for free and begging for food from people like Huffington who make money by writing books about how other people like her should come to America and take jobs and opportunities from Americans.

Ms. Huffington is a perfect example of why we must close the door to immigration before it is too late. At least we don't need more communists or those who hate our system of government and its reliance on free markets and freedom, and our custom of vibrant un-oppressed shoe-string operations. Immigration, as demonstrated to me by the likes of Ms. Huffington, has become counterproductive. If we need more Americans, then we need government to encourage Americans to have bigger families. Government can do that by letting them keep their own money. And they can do that by removing oppressive laws for small businesses.

These little operations can become Apple Inc. some day.

http://www.booktv.org/Watch/11827/After+Words+Arianna+Huffington+Third+World+America+How+Our+Politicians+Are+Abandoning+the+Middle+Class+and+Betraying+the+American+Dream+hosted+by+Maria+Bartiromo+CNBC.aspx

MY HOME IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

2010-08-16T04:27:00.000-07:00

Two days ago I went shopping at my local Walmart. During check out, I chatted politely with the cashier. And, as I often do, I inquired about how much longer she had on her shift. She was almost done. And she was especially excited about getting off because she was starting a ten day vacation.

I rejoiced with her as we completed my transaction. Then she added: "I'm going to my home". My facial expression was one of curious interest. And so she responded: "the Dominican Republic".

"Oh." I said curtly and took the receipt. "Have a good trip--have a safe trip" I replied. She kindly replied some small salutation, and I walked away.

I was heart-broken. I was almost ill.

I was heart-broken for my country and for my fellow Americans who rightfully deserve this vile ingrate's job. And I was heart-broken for my offspring who will be forced to live in minority status in their very own country because of genocide by the US government.

I was heart-broken for millions more who will be forced to give up opportunity and prosperity because my government wants a regional government and the abolition of the nation-state (the stated goal of the Council on Foreign Relations, which runs the USA.)

I was heart-broken because of all the treason that surrounds me in my migrant-worker community heavy with illegals.

What she said and what she did was an treasonous thing. And she was too stupid to know it and be ashamed of it. This is typical of the new immigrant. They are a stupid people. They are a stupid disloyal people. Sadly, that makes her the ideal immigrant. She has no intention on making America her home. That is what government officials prefer or else we wouldn't be flooded with millions of people like her. And we are flooded with them. She isn't planning on referring to my beloved country as her homeland. This pleases government officials. They don't want this country anymore. They want it destroyed. They prefer globalism. They are traitors.

Somewhere else is this woman's home.

Someplace else has her allegiance.

America is not a place that overwhelms her emotions so that it would come out naturally and instinctively in her conversation. The deep emotions were for another place, another country, another people. America is only a place to plunder. A place to invade. A place to defecate. It is a place to reshape into her image. It is not a place to become a part of. It is not a place to embrace. There are no great ideas that she loves. She doesn't even know our history or our great ideas. Because if she did she could not refer to any other place as her home.

She is just a greedy pig coming here for money and conquer. Her real home is a foreign country.

She is typical of the kind of people my subversive, dangerous, extremist, seditious, disloyal, and despotic government brings in to destroy my country and my civilization. It intentionally imports the most barbaric of hordes it can find and shoves them down our throats while they steal our future and our heritage from us and then lecture us arrogantly about how that we have always been an immigration nation.

We were never an immigrant nation like this woman represents. Our immigrants once assimilated. Now the immigration pattern is subversive and destructive. If government officials want to continue a great tradition in immigration then they should continue it by abolishing the current system and return to the one that produced assimilation instead of genocide.

Our old successful immigration tradition excluded nearby foreign hostiles and it excluded people too arrogant to have the courtesy or decency to learn English before OR after they arrive. Our old successful immigration tradition mostly EXCLUDED people from third world countries as they don't fit in well with Americans. And now that government has violated that old immigration tradition for a long time, it is clear the genocide is intentional.

Think: the ground zero Mosque. These people have no affection for the American people whose forefathers loved America.

The government is not running the same immigration system they claim is was such a big success in the past. It is running a new system which is opposite of the one whose results they praise.

Government praises our past immigration success while at the same time doesn't follow the template that made it a good. That old successful system preferred citizens from western lands and people who share our common values, traditions, and religion.

When government did that kind of immigration, it was a benefit to Americans. But now government has abandoned that great template for successful immigration and has changed to one that is causing genocide and the destruction of a civilization.

This pleases government officials, especially Democrats and leftists. They hate America and prefer to invite people here who have no love for our values, customs, and heritage.

They can better destroy America with foreigners who have no affection for her. That is why they want amnesty and immigration of barbarians.

Hispanic Goal: The Mexican Flag to Wave Over America After The Conquest

2010-08-02T09:59:00.000-07:00

The Fifth-Column invasion of the United States by foreign hostiles continues apace as this Hispanic invader demonstrates in the heart of America: a New York City baseball game.

The message is clear, but when those authorized to stop the invasion hear it?

Hispanics, in particular Hispanics from Mexico (even AFTER they have come here legally) have come for conquest. They have come to take over, not join in. Our seditious and treasonous leaders who supports the amnesty of these seditious invaders should be put on trial for treason.

Begin with the subversives, George Bush and John McCain.

http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/local_news/queens/men-run-onto-citi-field-with-mexican-flags-20100731

States MoveTo Defend Themselves From Hostile Foreign Invaders

2010-07-17T15:25:00.000-07:00

The states begin to assume their just powers while the US government's genocide of native born Americans and Americans of non-Hispanic European descent continues.

California government Arnold Schwarzenegger will send National Guard troops to his border territory in agreement with a reluctant White House which has heretofore dragged its feet regarding border security. This problem should have been handled nearly a year and a half ago. But, of course, the genocide by Hispanics, in particular, is as dearly desired by the Democratic Party at the federal level as it was and is by the GOP leadership.

So the job was not finished.

Here is the story about the Guard deployment at Sign On San Diego online (Hat tip Drudge Report).

Also in the news this weekend. The foreign invaders have taken a heavy toll in the desert heat this summer. Devoted unto death, it is likely that these are Hispanic Reconquista hostiles who continue in their quest to outstrip the population of the United States, steal its welfare benefits (wealth and treasure), and take over politically by sheer numbers. There is a story about the high death rate of the invaders this summer. (Reuters on Yahoo, Hat Tip Drudge Report).

The Reconquistas appear to be as committed to risk death to harm America as Muslim suicide bombers are. Sometimes nature has a say in these matters. Whether it's the German army bogged down by snow in Russia or the heat of the southern desert stopping the Reconquistas, sometimes the weather determines the outcomes of operations more than troops.

The Mexican government continues unabated in its attacks on the American people and justice system by demanding we let his invasion proceed unimpeded by our lawful resistance to it.

And how does the Mexican government treat US citizens? The Wall Street Journal has this story about two young Americans who claim to be framed on drug charges and abused by the government.

These young men were foolish to go into Mexico in the first place; Mexico is a barbaric drug state. It's government is more corrupt than the Obama White House, Justice Department, and the Democratically controlled Congress.

At least for the moment.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jul/15/national-guard-troops-will-go-border/

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100717/ts_nm/us_obama_republicans_3

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704288204575362862267177490.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories

Kyl vs Obama: Who Is Lying?

2010-06-23T22:00:00.000-07:00

I couldn't decide between which of my blogs to post this comment about Senator Kyl's recent meeting with Barack-No-Relation-To-Saddam-Hussein Obama. My post is naturally suited to this blog, but it could just as easily fit in with the Criminally-Minded Behavior blog (see the link to it on the left).

Senator Kyl says the president told him that "...the problem is...if we secure the border, then you all won't have any reason to support comprehensive immigration reform."

Oh, I see, then if a terrorist brings over a dirty bomb, it's all the better for legislative negotiations?

Does anyone have any reason to doubt Mr. Kyl's honesty or Obama diabolical ruthlessness? Who in their right mind would believe a word the White House says unless it is a word to harm, bully, intimidate, destroy, threaten, insult, or kick someone's ass?

Has America ever had a more hateful president?

We know what kind of man he is and thereby we know we cannot trust his denials. We know he is a Marxist* and they were the most dangerous group of murderous thugs in the 20th century. He has Marxist friends and associates (he invited some of them into his trusted circle of advisers). He is a known associate of an unrepentant terrorist and has, as his most trusted official adviser, a violent knife-wielding chief of staff who wishes death to his political opponents. Moreover, the president attended a church for twenty years led by an America damning pastor.

If this was MY history, I'd be on some government list somewhere as a threat to the United States.

Our president clearly hates this country and this is confirmed by his conduct and associations. No one should then be surprised if he lets terrorists in through the border just to insure more robust legislation (or genocide).

It has always been my contention that even George Bush intentionally left the border open in order to manipulate the public into accepting a totalitarian police-state by the chaos it causes. And that Bush was promoting genocide of the native-born American people of non-Hispanic European descent. Senator Kyl seems only to confirm what I have suspected for several years: the US government sponsored attack on America through immigration and unsecured borders.

Obama's admission, as Kyl presents it, confirms the US government's open attack on the American people. In other words, our government is intentionally terrorizing us with foreign hostiles which government willingly lets in.

Someone should be arrested and I don't think it is me or Senator Kyl. What is the purpose of the CIA if the president of the United States is openly allowing foreign hostiles to attack us?

Are there no real men left in America today?

Obama is a national security threat. His security clearance should be revoked. He is a dangerous, extremist, subversive who is supported ONLY by insane or stupid individuals.

The White House denies what Kyl said :

(You Tube)

*Marxism:

"At the time I wrote, socialism meant unambiguously the nationalization of the means of production and the central economic planning which this made possible and necessary. In this sense Sweden, for instance, is today very much less socialistically organized than Great Britain or Austria, though Sweden is commonly regarded as much more socialistic. This is due to the fact that socialism has come to mean chiefly the extensive redistribution of incomes through taxation and institutions of the welfare sate. In the latter kind of socialism the effects I discuss in this book [The Road to Serfdom] are brought about more slowly, indirectly, and imperfectly..." Friedrich Hayek, The Road To Serfdom, page xxiii, pb, The University of Chicago Press, 1994.

In other words taxation and the welfare state is the modern means to achieve Marxism. This is why Obama (and, actually all democrats) are Marxists even when they refuse to admit it or are too stupid to realize it. Taxation and the welfare state is their obsession.

Marxist are murderous monsters who prefer to murder via POLICY whenever possible. I'm sorry, but that is a fact. One example is government made disasters [like the food shortage in Venezuela]. Marxists always do this sort of thing. They murder people by disrupting their economies, displacing workers, criminalizing opponents, and demonizing businessmen. They murder by policy and treat humans as pawns on a game board. Then they have the gall to accuse businessmen of dehumanizing people.

Marxists on our shores have so far snuffed out the lives of 48 million defenseless human organisms in the womb. That is as bad as Mao Tse Dung. (Oops, did I say Dung? I meant Tung) And it is a typical Marxist slaughter that even the Chinese Communists have made it famous. If you don't think abortion is killing or murder, just try telling a democrat president to his face that you wish his mother had aborted him.

See what the secret service would do to you.

This is what leftist "do". They destroy others in very large numbers. Preferably while keeping their dainty hands clean and tidy, and pretending to be intellectuals.

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Janet Napolitano Is As Ignorant As She Wants To Be

2010-05-18T07:39:00.001-07:00

Janet Napolitano, who does always appear to be on destructive mind-bending drugs, came out immediately against the new Arizona immigration law and she condemned it.

Now we learn that she never read the bill. Now we suspect the mind-bending drugs even more.

I'm looking forward to leftists making as big of a stink about this as they did about George Bush not reading the newspapers and Sarah Palin not knowing what magazines she reads (they being interested in fairness or doctrines of fairness and all). After all, what is more important, reading the New York Times, listing the magazines you read, or reading the LAWS you make comments on while being a member of the law enforcement community?

I think it is safe to say that Bush and Palin are smart enough to know about the laws they are commenting on, and Napolitano is not. That is how BAD Nappy is.

Napolitano's behavior is the kind of conduct we have learned to expect from seditious government officials in the Obama Administration who accuse good people of being dangerous extremists in order to bully them and threaten them if they resist their usurpations.

The US government policy of genocide against WASP Americans just keeps rolling along.

And dangerous seditious extremists like Janet Napolitano make it easier.

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Good Answer, Miss Oklahoma

2010-05-17T15:40:00.000-07:00

The audience seems to be on her side.

See it here on You Tube:

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

From the Been There Done That Department: Bad Eagle Puts a Finger On The Realities of Genocide

2010-05-16T14:52:00.000-07:00

Muslims are forever offended by, not only the existence of non-Muslims living on the planet, but everything they say and do. So much so that it is a crime to practice Christianity in Saudi Arabia, the cradle of Islam. They'd like to take over America if they could and Democrats would help them do it. And why shouldn't they? It is a religion that adores an old dead geezer who had sex with a nine year old when the old fart was in his mid fifties. Now, that's a religion democrats can really get into, if you know what I mean?

A man who knows something about genocide, American Indian David Yeagley, has a good article about the [stupidevil] Muslims setting up a Mosque near the scar of the Twin Tower attack in New York City.

Yeagley appears to be quite upset about it. All decent people are. Which means Obama and the Democrats are not. Except maybe the slimeball, Up Chuck Schumer, who probably advocates Muslim immigration to the USA, but likely has the NIMBY syndrome about it: Not In My Back Yard.

Swell.

Anyway, Yeagley is, according to his website, the great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. So he knows about the genocide thingy and what kind of atmosphere it creates. Yet he is more offended by the Muslims and their evil ways than most leftists in America who, ultimately, the Muslims loathe.

Yeagley pulls no punches:

The cruel nature of Islam has displays [sic] itself once again. It is the impetus of satanic cruelty to denigrate, to degrade, to humiliate, to torture, to cause pain–in the most intense, conceivable ways possible. This is Islam. This is the Muslim way. It is demonstrated in the world time and time again. There is no quelling of this raging evil. The American government has shown itself the Islamic sympathizer. The American government prefers Muslims to Christians, or to any other kind of people.

You go dude. Sir.

And

"The prevaricating rhetoric of deluded Muslim clerics excedes [sic] the pretense of the Democrat Communists. Indeed, the Muslim mind is the Democrat model. Anything to denigrate, humiliate, to destory [sic] the Pilgrim fathers, the white, Christian founders of America. "

Yes indeed!

He appears to be as bad a typist as I am.

That makes him utterly charming, of course, and a likely candidate for being qualified to tell the truth. Brilliant grammatically correct writing and writers are a clue that the writer is probably unable to tell the truth, lacks the ability to think logically, is probably a buffoon, likely came from school districts, private schools, or Ivy League schools where students are well trained stylists steeped in loathing America, whites, Christians, and Western Civilization.

If they aren't making embarrassing grammatical mistakes on their blogs, in the magazines, and newspapers in a valiant effort to save our marvelous civilization and preserve the Constitution, you better take what they say with a grain of salt. That is, unless they are promoting genocide, murder, plunder, and theft.

Then you better believe them.

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience (as I am a habitually bad typist, speller, and grammatic nightmare).

RACE WARS AND OTHER US GOVERNMENT PLOTS

2010-05-14T01:22:00.000-07:00

The US Government's genocide of white Americans of European descent on verge of breaking out in chaos.

Machete is here (Alex Jones). The demonization of whites is essential.

Multiculturalism NEVER works. Our nation's leaders have imported our destruction with a seditious and treasonous immigration program and tens of millions of horrible immigrants who despise us, come for plunder, and conquest.

Amnesty is genocide.

Immigration matorium now!

http://www.prisonplanet.com/racist-film-%E2%80%98machete%E2%80%99-produced-with-taxpayer-funds.html

Small American Victory In Migrant Community!

2010-05-06T05:56:00.000-07:00

A small victory in the battle against the US government sponsored genocide of Americans of European descent occurred yesterday.

Before I left to make my usual rounds, which includes travel skirting a migrant community, I was diligent to write a little protest sign on a large sticky label to wear on my shirt. It read "Real Americans Celebrate the 4th of July, Not the 5th of May".

As I drove around and before I made a stop, I noticed nary a word about Cinco de Mayo in the public square. I didn't see preparations being made at homes for celebrations. And, most importantly, there was no commercial groveling by the local grocery stores. No posters, no specials, no balloons. I ripped off the sticker and put it away.

This is a hopeful sign and I will post a final comment on this subject after driving around over the weekend.

On this National Day of prayer before President Obama came to power, I'd like to offer a prayer of thanksgiving to the Lord for helping beat back the forces of evil in and out of government which promote the genocide of whites, protestants, and Americans of European descent through legal and illegal immigration.

UPDATE: May 10, 2010 All was quite here throughout the weekend. There were no signs of celebration nor pandering to the Hispanics by local businessmen. Very good news.

And the foolish principal at Live Oak High School in Morgan Hill, California made an official apology for his stupid actions last week against students who wore patriotic American clothing on Cinco De Mayo. See the apology at Hot Air. That's more good news on the anti-genocide front.

The reason the principal took actions in the first place is because he KNOWS the Hispanic students could not be trusted to behave. This is because Hispanics arrogantly think they own the place and have a high crime rate. Hispanics are 19 times more likely to belong to gangs too (Jared Taylor).

No one in their right mind would ever would think wearing patriotic American clothing was inflammatory in American until the Hispanics got here in large numbers and started bullying and intimidating loyal citizens who invited the Hispanics here in the first place.

This is only more proof that Hispanics ought to be banned from further immigration and rejected for amnesty. They are unfit for the privilege.

Hispanics are more than willing to participate in the US government sponsored immigration genocide, which now also includes culture destroying celebrations about the national military victories of Mexico instead of America.

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/05/09/video-principal-apologizes-for-disciplining-students-who-wore-american-flag-clothing-on-cinco-de-mayo/

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

I Adore Congressman Ron Paul But....

2010-05-04T08:10:00.000-07:00

He has a very large blind-spot his field of vision. That spot is the issue of legal immigration and "illegal" immigration.

There is an article up on his Campaign for Liberty website about the new Arizona alien invader law. Here is the text of the article written by Michael Boldin. Boldin tries to assert that the law is constitutional. It probably is, but I don't think it would be for the reasons Boldin states.

Boldin writes that the dictionary definition of the word naturalization does not necessarily mean that the Constitution gave the federal government the power to determine naturalization rules. Now, I'm a big fan of the 10th amendment, but I don't buy that.

Because of the dictionary definition from the 18th century Boldin concludes:

"I have yet to hear a convincing argument that control over who can and cannot cross a border was considered by the Founders to be an incidental (lesser and directly required) power related to the delegated power over naturalization."

Please, Mr. Boldin, let me try to find one for you.

What did the Founders (and not the dictionary) have to say about that? Let me quote at length from Federalist No. 42 written by James Madison (Avalon Project). Beginning in the eleventh paragraph, we read:

"The dissimilarity in the rules of naturalization has long been remarked as a fault in our system, and as laying a foundation for intricate and delicate questions. In the fourth article of the Confederation, it is declared "that the FREE INHABITANTS of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice, excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of FREE CITIZENS in the several States; and THE PEOPLE of each State shall, in every other, enjoy all the privileges of trade and commerce,'' etc...

...There is a confusion of language here, which is remarkable. Why the terms FREE INHABITANTS are used in one part of the article, FREE CITIZENS in another, and PEOPLE in another; or what was meant by superadding to "all privileges and immunities of free citizens,'' "all the privileges of trade and commerce,'' cannot easily be determined...

...It seems to be a construction scarcely avoidable, however, that those who come under the denomination of FREE INHABITANTS of a State, although not citizens of such State, are entitled, in every other State, to all the privileges of FREE CITIZENS of the latter; that is, to greater privileges than they may be entitled to in their own State: so that it may be in the power of a particular State, or rather every State is laid under a necessity, not only to confer the rights of citizenship in other States upon any whom it may admit to such rights within itself, but upon any whom it may allow to become inhabitants within its jurisdiction. But were an exposition of the term "inhabitants'' to be admitted which would confine the stipulated privileges to citizens alone, the difficulty is diminished only, not removed...

...The very improper power would still be retained by each State, of naturalizing aliens in every other State. In one State, residence for a short term confirms all the rights of citizenship: in another, qualifications of greater importance are required. An alien, therefore, legally incapacitated for certain rights in the latter, may, by previous residence only in the former, elude his incapacity; and thus the law of one State be preposterously rendered paramount to the law of another, within the jurisdiction of the other...

...We owe it to mere casualty, that very serious embarrassments on this subject have been hitherto escaped...

...By the laws of several States, certain descriptions of aliens, who had rendered themselves obnoxious, were laid under interdicts inconsistent not only with the rights of citizenship but with the privilege of residence. What would have been the consequence, if such persons, by residence or otherwise, had acquired the character of citizens under the laws of another State, and then asserted their rights as such, both to residence and citizenship, within the State proscribing them? Whatever the legal consequences might have been, other consequences would probably have resulted, of too serious a nature not to be provided against...

...The new Constitution has accordingly, with great propriety, made provision against them, and all others proceeding from the defect of the Confederation on this head, by authorizing the general government to establish a uniform rule of naturalization throughout the United States. " [My emphasis, coloration, and separation into paragraphs for ease of reading. Capitalization is from the original].

What James Madison is saying is that there was already a chaotic condition of naturalization rules possessed by the individual states of the Confederation existing under the laws of the Confederation during the deliberations of the Constitutional Congress. And he said the individual states having control over the power of immigration was a "fault". He says that in the opening paragraph above.

He then concludes by stating clearly that the proposed Constitution authorizes "...the general government to establish a uniform rule of naturalization throughout the United States."

The general government Madison is referring to is the Federal government, not the individual states.

It couldn't be any more clear.

Debates held several years after Madison penned those words confirm what Madison said. As Elliot's Records of the Debates of Congress reads, Page 1148 on "Rules of Naturalization", February 3, 1790:

"Mr. Hartley said, he had no doubt of the policy of admitting aliens to the rights of citizenship; but he thought some security for their fidelity and allegiance was requisite besides the bare oath; that is, he thought an actual residence of such a length of time as would give a man an opportunity of esteeming the government from knowing its intrinsic value, was essentially necessary to assure us of a man's becoming a good citizen. The practice of almost every State in the Union countenanced a regulation of this nature; and perhaps it was owing to a wish of this kind, that the States had consented to give this power to the General Government. The terms of citizenship are made too cheap in some parts of the Union; to say, that a man shall be admitted to all the privileges of a citizen, without any residence at all, is what can hardly be expected."

Is it not absolutely clear then? And it didn't take me long to find this information on the internet. It's not like Mr. Boldin doesn't have the same access as I do.

I find the 1790 statement fascinating because it assumes that some persons waiting to be naturalized might prove to be unfit because they do not "esteem"our government even if they "know its intrinsic value".

I assert that Hispanics, as a group, don't even know what are our intrinsic values such that they could esteem the Constitution and the government it provides. They are about as bad a large immigrant pool as we have ever had, who openly flaunt their contempt for our intrinsic values.

If ever there was a immigrant pool who fit a category of undeserving persons it is the Hispanic people in America. Nearly to a person they will not admit that a moratorium is necessary. They are totally unable to put the interests of America (and her intrinsic values) ahead of their own ethnocentric viewpoint because they simply refuse to admit that their ethnic group possesses a shamefully unfair, unbalanced and monopolistic grip on the immigration system such that it poses a threat to our national security. Instead they flock to the Democratic Party in part because of bribes (welfare handouts) and amnesty.

There has never been a more disreputable immigrant pool by virtue of their own conduct.

The reason the Founders discussed the need for rules of naturalization is because they understood that some people didn't deserve the privilege.

Indeed.

The biggest problem I find with Libertarians, is that they tend to be intellectually lazy on the matter of national sovereignty and immigration. There is little if any love of country in them.

They are not worse than the Democrats, of course, who intentionally hack away at our foundations driven by their hatred of them.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed42.asp

Incitement!

2010-04-27T02:45:00.000-07:00

An angry mob was making noise over the week-end and acting out in Arizona after a new law was signed that permits law-enforcement to uphold Federal immigration law. (MSNBC)

The Nazi symbols, "hate" signs, and refried-bean vandalism flowed in the streets.

How can this be?

Clearly, according to Democratic Party leaders like Bill Clinton and media shills like the Huffington Post, the Nazi symbols, aggression, and vandalism was incited by people like Bill Clinton and those at the Huffington Post who stoke the aggression and vandalism against government with their words. After all the government is so pure and virtuous and precious, who could not trust it? It is benevolent and honest, who should need to protest it?

MSNBC reports that the president "... warned last week that the measure could lead to police abuses...".

Who believes a word of concern by our president when he continually lies to the American people? Clearly, only a fool. We know that if the president really cared about police abuses he wouldn't allow the Department of Homeland Security to continue its operations another blessed day. The Department of Homeland Security is this very moment prepping to slaughter us in the streets. We have no need to worry about the unconstitutional threat of a standing army attacking the American people to rob then of their liberty and lives when you have the Department of Homeland Security willing to step up and play the role.

President Barack Hussein Obama is a liar who cannot be believed except when he threatens to destroy us or send his murderous wolves against us if we speak out about our corrupt and wicked government which has been usurped by people like President Obama.

And it appears that our compulsive liar of a President is provoking and permitting rising aggression, vandalism, invasion, and murder by allowing the border with Mexico to remain unsecured. The invasion from the south is a violation of the Constitution which requires the Federal government to guarantee each state a republican form of government. How can that occur much longer with foreign hostiles invading it, and local law enforcement unable to stop it, and those promoting the invasion swarming the capital of Phoenix?

With invaders flooding in, overrunning its territory, murdering Americans, and overwhelming Arizona state law-enforcement, the president incites and provokes chaos everywhere along the border and at the capital. What is the president's response?

To threaten Arizona officials with civil rights investigations and not to act to secure the border.

He should be impeached for his lying about upholding the Constitution.

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Arizona's New Illegal Immigrant Law

2010-04-24T14:01:00.000-07:00

As I watched the images on TV (CNN) of the protesters marching near the state capital in Arizona because of a new bill signed into law making invading the USA a "crime", I couldn't help but notice that most of the protesters were Hispanic. There were a few non-Hispanic folks and it seems that only they were on screen making a few brief comments. But the camera shots were mostly on the sea of Hispanics.

Shall we anticipate that our fair-minded mainstream media will now begin to rant and rave hysterically and endlessly about the fact that there were so many brown people gathered together in one place and that that act indicates racism? After all, isn't that what was said about the Tea Party people who were somehow guilty of racism based solely on the fact that they were gathering while white?

Whites were not given the benefit of the doubt that their serendipitous gatherings were a result of real outside factors provoking a response. No. It was because they were white (and therefore racists)!

What is striking about Hispanics is that none of them (none that I know of) will admit that Hispanic immigration to the United States is unbalanced, monopolistic, and patently unfair. It doesn't even register with them.

Apparently, they assume they are special characters who deserve to have a special immigration privilege among all other non-white groups. Yet, one is at a loss to see anything about the Hispanics that would make them special. The Asian immigrant is smarter and learns English better. We don't even have to beg them to do it. They go to college at higher rates and have a lower crime rate than even the white population. They don't demand language privileges and they join in with society and don't demand special ethnic privileges. They also become loyal citizens, unlike the Hispanic immigrant who cannot get past his or her Latino culture and allegiance long enough to promote America's best interests. And we are several generations into their migration pattern enough to recognize what kind of citizens they become.

It appears that over time, most Hispanic immigrants have none of good qualities that makes them a desirable pool to select from when compared to other groups. In fact, their continuing promotion of further monopolistic Hispanic immigration (the promotion of which is itself a dishonest act) could be easily regarded as prima facie evidence that they are incapable of being loyal citizens. They pose a sort of a national security, fifth-column threat by being loyal to the miserable countries they have fled. This poses a threat that the Asian will likely never pose by virtue of geography.

The Hispanic people don't recognize what a serious threat they pose to the survival of the American civilization and might be intellectually or emotionally incapable of it. Though their loyalties lay elsewhere, they don't even like themselves. They flee from themselves and the cultures they create. Who can blame them?

Hispanics don't even want to live with their fellow Hispanics who create bad places to live which they must flee. And instead of throwing off that which they have fled from and joining in with our culture (we don't flee to theirs), they drag their failed customs, traditions, and habits to our shore and repeat the same failed mistakes here.

These are a repugnant people who put their own ethnicity and clannishness above the welfare of the United States. And they are even repugnant to themselves.

If Hispanics were a good immigrant pool, they would insist vociferously on a complete ban of Hispanic immigration to the United States.

Probably in perpetuity.

What Do We Want? Genocide! When Do We Want It? Now!

2010-04-08T00:28:00.000-07:00

MSNBC calls the US Government sponsored genocide of WASPs in America through immigration a "historic trend". This is like calling rape merely a temporary release of sexual tension. Oh, and the gang over at Fox New's Red Eye show simply makes a joke about it. (The video of it isn't available at Hulu or You Tube--yet).

And so a little Haiku about the WASP genocide appears to be in order. I call it Amnesty Season, though traditionally Haikus don't have titles:

bloodless genocide
kill off whites
brown people do want

by Boaz (that crazy white girl)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35793316/ns/us_news-life/

Protesting While White=Racism, And Other Assorted White Genocide Issues

2010-04-02T08:06:00.001-07:00

But the Tea Party folks are not what this post is about specifically. While Maxine Waters was complaining that people are racists when they protest while white, Michael Medved was livid about the obscene racial questions the US Government Census asks Americans. Of course, Waters didn't use those terms, I did.

But I don't know why Medved is upset about the racial questions on the census form. How else can the US government be sure the genocide against white Americans through legal immigration is going as planned if they don't count skin color?

Now that the genocide is going swimmingly, and right-wing media is exposing the unconstitutional nature of the census beyond a head-count, look for the intrusive census form to go the way of the dinosaur.

The US government will have a new way of making sure whites are a minority anyway: the Marxist fascist take over of the health care system.

All the needed racial information necessary to track the genocide and make sure it is happening will be safe and secure in the hands of the Marxist tyrants in the Democratic Party through our medical records.

I don't know why Michael is whining anyway, he supports the genocide as he promotes a vigorous imbalanced legal immigration system that gives a monopoly to non-whites and non-westerners. If he didn't support the genocide, he would support a moratorium on all immigration.

He doesn't.

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

Doctors Know Why Birth Weight Rate Is Down

2010-03-12T05:42:00.001-08:00

People hate the truth.

That is why sayings like this Slavic proverb come into being: Tell the truth and run!

People do hate the truth and that is why so little of it is being told in America today. Tell the truth and you get canned from the internet, from chat rooms, and from websites. Tell the truth and people want you dead.

Americans simply loathe the truth. And so you need not look any further than the typical immature American adult to see why we are in such deep trouble on a number of fronts. Americans don't want to hear, for example, that some very large racial groups have low IQs. But they are happy to hear about the ones with high IQs. Funny, those Americans.

There is this report from ABCNews about the stunning and sudden drop in birth-weight among American babies (just wait until they notice the sudden drop in height among American babies, and the sudden drop in overall IQ rates in America).

Our little scientists/medical professionals act like they don't know what is going on (they do but just cannot say it because--you guessed it-- people hate the truth).

Such truths are a specialty here at US Government Genocide blog. The reason birth weights are dropping after (as the article says) 50 years of satisfactory rise and stability is THE GENOCIDE being conducted by the US government through immigration.

We are importing "tiny people" from the south of Mexico. Not only are they actually physically little, they are also uneducated, come from low IQ areas of the world, and have babies too early. Couple that with the crappy food they eat and you have a recipe for low birth-weight, lower height, and lower intelligence overall for America as a whole as seen in the statistical record. And that's just the start of the problems.

This devolution of our population and assault on its very physical and intellectual stature is a global-warming hoax-style of leftist junk science leftists probably wish to trick us into believing is "evolution". Why would our leaders permit this? Undoubtedly it is because it is not in the best interest of the slave-masters in the Democratic Party (and McCain and Bush) to ADVANCE the biological stature, intelligence, and health of the American people.

Nuh, uh.

Our slave masters need a less intelligent population to rule over and suck the life-blood from. These slave-masters include the US Chamber of Commerce and the Wall Street journal, who are also active promoters of the genocide. Who needs smart people anyway when you support outsourcing the brain jobs?

Democrats also need a populous which can be more easily persuaded into becoming cannon fodder (don't be fooled, democrats ADORE war) as now too many of the white boys no longer agree to be slaughtered on command in US wars of aggression dressed up to be "self-defense". George Bush liked that idea too.

There are not as many of them (white boys) after the sexual revolution, abortion, and sexually transmitted diseases have taken their due course and produced a population often physically and certainly morally corrupt people incapable of reproducing themselves (just as the Soviets and Communists hoped for).

Enter the fecund barbarians.

This scheme to obliterate and enslaves whites in America by overwhelming their genotype with groups that will drag down the cultural and intellectual development of the American people of European descent as a whole isn't going to work in the long run and if you doubt me just check out South American history. But our slave masters and genocide promoters don't live for the long run, so this doesn't bother them.

Our new "immigrants" are practically pygmies. The migrant men in my area from way south of south of the border barely reach five foot tall on average. And this is the men. Four foot eleven on average is the classic height of a Pygmy.

It is these people who are contributing to the decline on US weight-charts and this is what the US government (especially democrats) want.

The US government is intentionally harming the biological development of its native-born citizens of European descent by stressing them with a genetic influx of groups whose members are stunting the overall physical and mental growth as a people. These less healthy and less intellectually able people become a burden on Americans of European descent much like one species of animal goes extinct from a geographic area because of the stress caused by the invasion of another group.

That is why such an event is called "geno" cide. It is the killing off of a genotype, however it is done. Of course, it must be done with intent. And surely that is what is happening here because we have all the stats and are watching them develop before our eyes.

By leftist reasoning, the Caucasian race should be put on the endangered species list.

In addition to this biological devolution of the people of the USA, the new citizens become a tax burden on the native born population of European descent because of the fact that people with lower IQs stay in the lower classes and become dependent on welfare and crime. This further stresses whites physical well being and even reducing white family size as it become too expensive to have their own children while funding the welfare programs and paying for the higher crime rate. This is all purposeful conduct on the part of liberal whites in both major parties and therefore it is genocide. And now Obama is picking up the tradition. He will force the illegals on the American people.

You can biologically stress white folks in America, but please don't biologically stress out a Snail Darter, a Polar Bear, or a fresh water fish.

That's a no no!

To devolve a people this way, intentionally, all or in part, without their consent is, by definition, genocide.

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/health&id=7286963

Hispanic Population Bomb: Key To Government's Genocide of WASPS

2010-01-26T13:39:00.000-08:00

It's the immigration stupid.

Illegal and otherwise.

Stop importing people from immoral cultures and that will solve most of the increase we see in teen pregnancy.

Guttmacher's Larry Finer appears to be blaming abstinence education but this Reuters article says black teen pregnancy has gone down. So if abstinence education is the problem then why didn't black teen pregnancy go up?

He isn't making sense, but he is probably a leftist and leftists don't make sense.

You cannot successfully bump-off the white protestant culture unless you invite in millions of non-white non-protestant people with the sexual habits of an alley cat.

Here is a better break-down of the stats that left-wingers don't want you to understand.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60P0XS20100126?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews&rpc=22&sp=true

http://www.vdare.com/thom/090316_births.htm

Merry Christmas To All

2009-12-25T06:24:00.000-08:00

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

Isaiah 9:6 KJV

William Grigg, Joe Arpaio, US Genocide, and Fascism

2009-12-16T23:18:00.000-08:00

Will Grigg, who I like, has done an in-depth article about Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa county, Arizona. (from Lew Rockwell)

I am very much opposed to the genocide being conducted by the US government on Americans of European descent, surely as much as I am opposed to the police-state Department of Homeland Security or any local police force which is abusive of citizen rights.

If what Grigg writes about Arpaio is factual, and it certainly seems so, Arpaio is scum of the earth for his abuse of power. But I wonder if Griggs is opposed to all responses to what can only be described as an invasion of the United States nearby peoples?

Is Grigg saying there is no lawful or righteous means for government to address the invasion? I don't know because he certainly never said so, he just says there should be no government response. He hauls out Edmund Burke to bolster his position.

Grigg writes:

"But to paraphrase Edmund Burke, police-state methods, once tolerated, are soon institutionalized. What do we gain if every illegal immigrant is sent home – and we end up living under a near-replica of the third-world dictatorships those people had fled? "

Well, that's the trick isn't it? If we do stop the invasion, according to Grigg we will become the "near-replica of the third-world dictatorships those people had fled". The problem is if we don't stop the invasion we end up in the same place because that is all these people know. They are coming here to America and becoming members of the Democratic Party, which is fully committed to Marxism. What else will these people do but turn America into Venezuela north?

I think there has to be something missing from Grigg's analysis, because it doesn't make sense that a country would have to allow itself to be invaded by hordes of barbarians in order to avoid being a police-state resembling the places these hordes come from.

Grigg, especially because he offers no solution, appears to be saying that a "state" has no right to self-defense. The only solution Grigg appears to offer is our lying prostrate before the invading hordes who come here and populate the ranks of the Marxist Democratic Party now currently led by Barack Hussein Obama.

On the other hand, I think if our government was lawfully living up to its obligations to fend off the invasion, men like Arpaio wouldn't get the chance to take advantage of the situation and abuse power.

Grigg freely admits in his blog profile that he is a Christian. He says he is a

"Grateful follower of my Lord Jesus..."

I assume Grigg is, therefore, a Christian. So how does he square his faith with the right of a state or a nation to protect itself from invasion?

What does the Bible say?

Romans 13:3

For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil. Do you want to be unafraid of the authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise form the same.

Is Paul lying? Is the bible wrong? Did Grigg miss that verse? Is this a carte blanche command that Christians are to submit to all governments? No, it says that Christians are to be unafraid of government that recognizes "good works". And, naturally, those good works ought to be biblical in nature (and even the heathen are capable of doing them).

Inherent in that verse is the belief that there is such a thing as a good state or a good nation that can exercise power correctly to benefit not only all citizens, but Christians too.

Grigg has already admitted that many in Arizona government are appalled with Arpaio. That means there is still some good government left to which Grigg doesn't have to, according to scripture, fear.

More:

1 Peter 2:13-14

Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme;

Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well.

Now, I understand this verse quite clearly. It doesn't say to submit ourselves to government. It says submit ourselves to government which punishes evildoers. Not punishing the invading hordes is doing the opposite of that command, and Griggs is actually asking the government not to do what God says a government ought to do: punish evildoers.

Again, inherent in that verse is the idea that God approves of government, and government is legitimate, and in God's will IF it punishes evildoers. Actually the SOLE legitimacy of government, according to the bible, only comes from its punishment of evildoers. Naturally, an evil doer is what the bible says he or she is.

This must be accomplished in accordance to all the other biblical principles: thou shalt not lie (which the deputy in question did), and thou shalt not steal (which the deputy in question did), and so on and so forth.

I have always meant to do an post (at one of my other blogs) about Joseph Sobran's recent admission (2002) that he thinks he is an anarchist. Perhaps I should just interject some of my ideas about that into this story as it seems to be appropriate to the subject at hand.

This theme of anarchy runs a bit too strong for my liking over at Lew Rockwell's website and I was a bit disturbed to hear Sobran dabbling in the notion. Disturbed because anarchy is so very, very bad, especially for women and children. So it is awful for men to promote it, and in my mind, unmanly. And it is especially awful that Christian men might be promoting it.

If Sobran or Grigg want to promote something, or if Grigg wants to take guidance from Edmund Burke, the only suitable choice for them, if absolutely necessary, is revolution, not anarchy. Burke even hotly contested the legitimacy of the French Revolution, and defended the Glorious Revolution in 1688. Burke found no legitimate right for the French revolution, but he did find a legitimate right for the Glorious revolution and indeed the American Revolution.

Seeing that he distinguished even between good and bad revolutions, I'm going to go out on a limb here and speak for him that he would be steadfastly opposed to anarchy as it has, even less than revolutions like those in France, no decent goal to attain.

The difference for Burke was that the French revolution was conducted to destroy its government (the monarchy) and the Great Revolution was conducted to RESTORE the one which had been usurped. One was a legitimate uprising, the other was not.

If Grigg, Sobran, or the fellows and gals (there are a few of them) at Lew Rockwell are interested in promoting a legitimate response to the growing tyranny and despotism by government in America, it ought to be in terms of restoration (revolution), not anarchy. It's hard to get things right after revolution, and, I think, impossible to get things right after anarchy is ignited.

So what does Sobran say about Christianity and government that might apply to this post?

Sobran writes:

St. Paul seems to be more positive in affirming the authority of the state. But he himself, like the other martyrs, died for defying the state...

That is an incomplete conclusion from a biblical point of view. If anything Paul died for defying a corrupt state. To die when defying a state that executes the will of God is sinful. To die when defying a state that doesn't execute the will of God isn't. That such a state (one in which the government adheres to biblical principles) has never existed is not the issue. That the USA was one of the closest examples of a state attempting to live in accordance to God's plan for the nations is beyond question. All one has to do to prove it is to look at how great a civilization it became and to see what overflowing blessings were distributed to her.

The closer a government sticks to biblical principles (new testament principles) the more blessings it receives.

It is very frustrating to deal with alleged believers who don't seem to ever read their bibles. Sobran writes:

It's entirely possible that states--organized force--will always rule this world, and that we will have at best a choice among evils.

Entirely? Isn't it absolutely, and absolutely according to scripture? Back to Romans 13, this time verse one and two:

Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.

Again, the government--the higher powers--Christians are being told not to resist here are governments which punish evildoers and praise the the good (people). I know this because it says so in the verses which follow it, and I posted those previously. And inherent in this idea is that there is such a thing as legitimate government. Bad ones are to be resisted, good ones obeyed.

But no where do we find in scripture that God advocates anarchy or statelessness.

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/

http://www.sobran.com/reluctant.shtml

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glorious_Revolution

Happy Thanksgiving to All

2009-11-26T05:05:00.000-08:00

Psalm 100

Make a joyful noise unto the LORD, all ye lands.

Serve the LORD with gladness: come before his presence with singing.

Know ye that the LORD he is God: it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture.

Enter into his gates with thanksgiving; and into his courts with praise: be thankful unto him, and bless his name.

For the LORD is good; his mercy is everlasting; and his truth endureth to all generations.

.

Lee Kuan Yew Says Don't Bring in "Fruit Pickers"

2009-10-22T21:59:00.000-07:00

By golly, I agree.

Charlie Rose interviewed the former prime minister of Singapore yesterday. He seems like a very nice man. And everything he said was interesting.

Of course, he spoke nonsense about our Dictator-For-Another-Day, Barack Hussein Obama.

He also made an eye opening statement about our immigration policy. In particular the kind of immigrants we bring to our shores.

It was rich.

Mr. Yew spoke about how important immigration was to Singapore, and how that Japan was hurting from its lack of it. Charlie asked Mr. Yew if it was good for America, or something like that.

Yew said yes.

But he put a condition on it. We needed bright hard-working immigrants. Ah. Intelligent immigrants. What a concept! I wonder what he thinks of our current batch of immigrants who come here too often for handouts, and ruin hospitals, cities, towns, and neighborhoods while helping to destroy our culture?

Anyway, Yew said make sure your immigrants are not "fruit pickers".

I almost fell off my chair if I was sitting on one.

So I ask (rhetorically, of course) why have our leaders flooded the nation with swarms of low-life, uneducated, high-crime rate "fruit pickers" who gravitate too much towards our lower-class social pathologies (drugs, unwed motherhood, dropping out, abortion, and gangs)?. And why did they not instead flood the country with the more intelligent, more law-abiding, more decent Asian immigrant or the bright immigrants who melted into the pot as well as the Europeans once did?

I mean, if there was any flooding going on in the first place, it should be of the best and brightest.

They flooded us with barbarians to destroy us, of course.

It is called treason.

And genocide.

And the Democrats, John McCain, George the Imbecile Bush, the Wall Street Journal, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce led and lead the way.

(when the Rose link is up, I'll add it)

http://www.charlierose.com/schedule/

Here is the transcript with the "fruit picker" remark a little more than a third of the way down on the scroll bar to the right:

http://www.charlierose.com/download/transcript/10681

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank your for your patience.

Department of Homeland Security Needs Joe Arpaio to Stop Interfering With the Genocide

2009-10-14T23:02:00.000-07:00

One cannot have people arresting invaders crossing our borders if one is running a genocide operation using those invaders. It has been reported everywhere, that the dangerous, subversive, extremist thugs (my terms) at the Department of Homeland Security are going after Sheriff Joe Arpaio. He is enforcing the federal law against illegal invaders and that won't do.

The story is here at the USA Today blog.

The Federal Government is bound by the Constitution to protect the states from invasion. Article 4 Section 4 states:

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion..."

Janet Napolitano and the Department of Homeland Security are enemies of the American people. Napolitano should be removed from office for failure to uphold her sworn oath to defend the Constitution. And the evil Department of Homeland Security, which views good Americans as the bad guys, should be abolished.

Additional reading:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/parham1.1.1.html

Glenn Beck, Linda Chavez, and Illegal Aliens

2009-10-09T15:34:00.000-07:00

We are making progress in the fight against the US government's genocide of Americans of European descent, when a major news station--in this case Fox News--is willing to call a spade a spade.

Glenn Beck did an expose' on the connection between SEIU (service employees international union), government, big business, and illegals. The thing Beck was willing to do was call these barbarian invaders illegal aliens. You hardly hear that term these days because of the left-wing media and government officials.

The correct term in my opinion is illegal alien, though I prefer illegal invaders or just barbarians.

Unfortunately Beck had Linda Chavez on his show. She is a neo-con pro-genocide Hispanic. And though she condemned counting the illegal aliens in the next U.S. census, she is still in the pro-genocide enemy camp.

Linda supports something we need no more of: continued legal immigration by nearby Hispanic citizens who generally have more loyalty to their former lands, customs, and traditions than our own. And one cannot help but imagine that the only logical reason for this is her ethnocentric bias, because surely the Hispanic immigrant is NOT the best immigrant pool to choose from. It is among the worst.

She, being a republican, actually supports an immigration pattern that will change the nation into a Democratic Party country. And this will not be done by political persuasion, but by immigration of uneducated barbarians who are easily persuaded into voting for the bribes and handouts Democrats offer.

Beck needs more enlightenment on this issue and Chavez is not the person to give it to him.

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Border Guards Shoot At Invading Barbarians From Mexico

2009-09-24T03:05:00.001-07:00

I heard on the radio yesterday that nearly one-third of the people of Mexico want to come to America. I'm sorry I don't know which radio station it was.

With that in mind, it is too bad the border guards didn't kill all the drivers in the incident near San Diego, California. MSNBC is reporting that three vans were smuggling people into the US. There where 74 people in the vans and no one was killed during the incident.

This response, though weak, is a good way to send a message to border crashers.

Anyone crashing our border is someone without the kind of values needed to make America a good place to live. Crashing our border is evidence of immoral character. We have enough bad immigrants and invaders to last a lifetime and we do not need any more.

Nevertheless, we need plenty of cameras at the border gate areas to keep the guards in check and make sure they don't abuse Americans or foreigners coming or leaving lawfully or unlawfully. That means cameras inside border offices and holding areas. Border guards shouldn't be out of camera range except in bathrooms.

Women (of any status) should never be left alone with male guards and that should be federal law.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32976310/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

US GOVERNMENT GENOCIDE TRAILS

2009-08-31T10:12:00.000-07:00

Not only is the US government conducting open genocide on Americans of European descent through official immigration policy, it is also conducting an illegal invasion on behalf of foreign peoples coming from the south through our border intentionally left under-protected.

The Center for Immigration Studies,in this video clip, provides us with information gleaned from hidden government cameras provided halfheartedly by our derelict genocidal government officials.

Who will hold government officials accountable for these crimes?

Stop the genocide now: secure the border and fire everyone in congress who refuses to secure it.

Anyone not for an immigration moratorium is for the genocide.

http://cis.org/Videos/HiddenCameras-IllegalImmigration

The Grand Pooh-Bah of US Genocide is Dead

2009-08-27T03:45:00.001-07:00

Senator, the WASP Genocide promoter, Ted Kennedy is dead!

And "ring those bells out" (Munchkins).*

"Yes let the joyous news be spread" (Mayor of Oz).

Poohbah Update:

Here at Vdare.

http://www.lyricsondemand.com/soundtracks/w/thewizardofozlyrics/dingdongthewitchisdeadlyrics.html

http://vdare.com/richer/090901_kennedy_curse.htm

When Committing Genocide Against White Anglo-Saxon Protestants, Do it Quickly: Divide and Conquer

2009-08-19T04:33:00.000-07:00

The US government, which I herein charge with genocide against the ancestors of white protestant Europeans, has perpetrated this crime on the citizens of America by various means which have quickly come to fruition by the immigration invasion of foreign barbarians and hostiles. This, after decades long subversion of American children in the public schools by leftist usurpers.

The leftists seized control of the schools, taught American children to loathe themselves, their ancestors, the better part of their history, and their country. They then set about REPLACING their own posterity with outsiders from non western foreign lands who, with very little in common with Americans, came for plunder and harbored no real intentions for joining in with American culture or adopting American traditions and values as bequeathed to us by our founding citizens.

These leftists also made sure to destroy European posterity through abortion WHILE they increased foreign populations on our soil through out of control immigration and invasion of non-European peoples.

After having successfully debased several generations of youngsters and snuffed out any requisite affection for country needed to ensure its survival as it was bequeathed to us, and destabilizing it by a flood of non-western foreign hostiles, this government (especially under the leadership of treasonous usurpers like Ted Kennedy and John McCain) have successfully cultivated a nation of people who do not care about the welfare of the United States--her future success, peace, happiness, and prosperity.

The great British statesman and philosopher Edmund Burke describes what happens when a civilization or nation thus murders itself as our leaders have over the past forty years.

He writes (pg 95*):

But one of the first and most leading principles on which the commonwealth and the laws are consecrated, is lest the temporary possessors and life-renters in it, unmindful of what they have received from their ancestors, or of what is due to their posterity...

Interpretation:

Those who only "rent" a country (Obama, Rahm Emanuel, Bush, McCain, Kennedy), and all others who do not look backwards in loyalty to American ancestors and forwards to the posterity of our ancestors, have no genuine loyalty to this country.

Burke:

...unmindful...of what is due to their posterity, should act as if they were the entire masters; that they should not think it amongst their rights to cut off the entail, or commit waste on the inheritance, but destroying at their pleasure the whole original fabric of their socieity; hazarding to leave to those who come after them, a ruin instead of an habitation...

Interpretation:

These renters [Obama, Emanuel, Pelosi, Reid, Bush, McCain] act like they are their own masters over only the space and time they live in and have no obligation to those before or after them. They have no desire to maintain of the bonds of continuity between former generations and those to come. In fact, they want to sever those bonds through "change". They think it their right for the brief moment in time they are here to gut the Constitution, dismember our traditions, castrate our common faith, amputate our values, corrupt our laws, and waste the national treasure built up over generations to be spent on their own temporary fancies and lust for power.

They plunder the treasure of generations to come by their orgiastic-like profligate spending spree coupled with taxation theft in order to secure to themselves and only THEIR families and friends a guaranteed prosperity. And as they do this they seek to acquire for themselves an absolute power which corrupts and ultimately leads to tyranny and violence. The people have not been able to discredit the mindset of these diabolical usurpers, which never changes, even when the individual characters who come and go on the political stage of America are replaced.

These renters destroy the fabric of our civilization with their anti-Judeo-Christian values even though many of them pretend to be Christians. Thinking they have the right to change the unique nature of America into something they've seen overseas and prefer, they have torn away the right of the American people for national self-determination. They leave a ruin and a wreckage.

Burke:

...to leave to those who come after them a ruin instead of an habitation--and teaching these successors as little to respect their contrivances, as they had themselves respected the institutions of their forefathers.

Interpretation:

These renters [Obama, Emanuel, Reid, and Pelosi] who have no loyalty to our American ancestors nor any genuine concern for the posterity of these same ancestors teach other leaders and citizens to despise those very things (our institutions, laws, and customs) which were established to bring them the great freedom and prosperity they have enjoyed throughout their lives.

Burke:

By this unprincipled facility of CHANGING [my emphasis] the state as often, and as much, and in as many ways as there are floating fancies or fashions, the whole chain and continuity of the commonwealth would be broken.

Interpretation:

The whole chain of continuity IS, at this moment, being broken by Obama and the democrats. We no longer even recognize the people who walk our streets, they are unfamiliar and are not like us. They are not from our ancestors and they are not our ancestors' posterity. They are the posterity of foreign peoples who share little if anything of our values, traditions, customs, desires, hopes, or dreams. They come to rob the inheritance of our children.

They are foreign barbarians who have contempt for us and fully reject our ways. We did not invite them here to make us a minority race, ethnicity, religion, or culture in our own land; they were forced upon us without our permission. Our government promised us that immigration would not change our ethnic make-up, when in fact the US government it has destroyed the ethnic make-up it swore to preserve and continues to destroy it this very moment as fast as they can. They all the records and statistics about the nature and quantity of immigrants and the nature and quality of the genocide by immigration. They refused and continue to refuse to throw illegal invaders out.

All this is, according to international law, genocide.

The foreigners have come for plunder and to conquer, and our leaders have invited them to do so.

Burke:

No one generation could link with the other. Men would become a little better than the files of a summer.

No interpretation needed.

*All Burke quotes are from Reflections on the Revolution in France, edited by L.G. Mitchell, Oxford University Press, 1993, paperback edition.

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Ahh, Now I Get It: Obama-Care Includes Medicare Part W (for whitey)

2009-08-12T18:20:00.000-07:00

Note (I am a Caucasian).

It is whites who will bear the brunt of Obama-care health "reform". How fitting that the genocide party (the Democratic Party) will bump off white folks even FASTER than they hoped with Obama-care. But it won't be before Obama and the democrats steal as much of whitey's money as possible. And here I it was just immigration that was going to do them in!

I must be clueless.

Yes, I know that the Dems are mostly white folks (for the moment). But they are probably the kind of whites whose family members might have used the N-word thirty years ago and they cannot stop flogging themselves about it. And I think it is twisting their minds too.

Will Obama-care thoroughly purge guilty white liberals/progressives/Democrats of their evil thoughts and or past deeds? Hard to say since democrats are generally deranged and depraved persons, and little can help them except the truth. Unfortunately they avoid that like an illegal alien invader running from the Border Patrol.

Anyway. My fictional Medicare Part W (remember, W stands for whitey!) is that part of Obama-care that will tend to deny full benefits to the elderly who in the near future are mostly, you guessed it, white.(So much for medical care being a "right").

How else will democrats punish all those white folks out there in the hinterlands who once used the N-word and got away with it. They need to be punished! What better way to do that than to deny them health-care benefits and bump them off early?

Gotcha!

A greater number of whites, more than non-whites, will certainly be robbed by such a proposed system in order to pay for a greater and greater share of non-white's health care. Apparently, whites deserve this. Older whites, who have already put more money (taxation) into the past medicare and medicaid system than younger non-whites will, in a decade or so, be denied their fair share of the benefits based on a type of (ruthless and evil) "cost-benefit" calculus. Aren't most folks like to get old some day?

Adding insult to genuine injury, the illegal barbarians come along, gain citiizenship, put virtually NOTHING into the system in comparison and are breeding like rabbits and getting the hogs share of medical goodies because they are younger. Does that sound fair?

After the whites are thus robbed and denied benefiting from that which they contributed, I guess reparations to blacks will have been accomplished plus a large number of greedy Hispanics got in on the thievery through invasion!

Wow, what a cool story!

Eventually white democrats will be left to die in as quick a fashion as they have arranged for others . And that's the only good part of this story.

By then, America will be a crap-hole like Mexico and all health-care like Cuba.

Oh boy! It's hope and change on a massive scale!

Call it catastrophic coverage!

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Glenn Jacobs and Immigration: A Starvation Diet

2009-08-04T09:21:00.000-07:00

I ran across a fella (figuratively) via Lew Rockwell. His name is Glenn Jacobs. He is oft times one of those crazy-looking wrestlers you see on TV--like Jesse Ventura. They dress in Halloween type costumes, do a lot of painful looking stunts, and make an awful lot of grunting and growling noises.

It is all quite embarrassing (them being grown men and all).

Anyway, he still has a functioning brain, is a pretty good writer, and writes about political matters at his own blog. See it here.

He currently has an immigration article up at his blog (at the above link) in which he absurdly uses the word immigration in his portrayal of the invading hordes of barbarians (mostly from Mexico). Though he has nice writing he does demonstrate a big flaw in Libertarian thinking, which I have discussed elsewhere on my other blog Conservative-Media Review.

This flaw is that Libertarians think anarchy will allow them to continue to be Libertarians, but it won't. This is a Utopian fantasy which ignores human nature and the historical record. There is simply NOTHING in human nature or human history that would lead any sensible person to believe that everyone individually on earth (or even a good portion of them) will agree to let everyone else live in liberty, or without a "state".

The anarchy Libertarians promote will wind up getting them killed or enslaved because stronger guys and the larger group of people who don't give a hoot about liberty will gather around them and stomp out these earnest, bookish, nerds: the Libertarians.

Libertarianism is a Utopian dream; it is as Utopian as its polar opposite: Communism. Neither ideology understands human nature and neither can be widespread without great human suffering. Both of them are harshest on women. This might be why you will see very few women advocating Libertarianism (anarchy isn't comfy). Communism is different on that account. It promises what the devil promised Eve, and women fall for that all the time. Promises, promises, I'm all through with......never mind.

Jacobs writes that it is futile to prevent invasion by foreigners and that:

"these tasks are impossible, unwarranted, and, even if they could be construed as positive, will lead to greater infringements on the liberties of all Americans."

It's odd that a guy who makes a living by PRETENDING to be a warrior of sorts doesn't have the guts to stand up for this country but sure profits wonderfully from living in it.

What greater infringement on the liberties of Americans is there than an invasion by hostile, plundering barbarians who have no respect for our laws, our property, our culture, our customs, our heritage, and "culturally" don't give a damn about books, the life of the mind, or well-sculpted ideas like libertarianism?

They generally lack the form of intelligence requisite to a free people. Great numbers of them are money-grubbing welfare leeches. They have a higher crime rate than other BETTER (YES BETTER) immigrant groups, like those from Asia. Massive numbers of them take on the worst characteristics of our LOWEST classes. Again, this is UNLIKE the more intelligent and law abiding Asian immigrant.

And damned too many of them maintain a greater loyalty to the former nearby lands they abandoned than Jacobs exhibits to his own land which he agrees (even before an attempt to stop it) should be plundered and ransacked by these brute beasts.

What is Jacobs's brawn for? Anything of importance to others or just a lot of fluff for Glenn to satisfy himself with while he dabbles around (mistakenly?) advocating peril for others?

How will there ever BE the blessings of liberty if anyone and everyone can overrun this country, and invade it, and do whatever they please? I've lived in liberty all my life until now that it is threatened at every turn. How is anarchy going to get me back to where I once was?

Isn't insuring that we let in only those immigrants who VALUE liberty and the traditions which encourage it, the only way to preserve it? Not according to the Libertarians! They think you can flood the nation with anti-liberty barbarians and remain free.

Maybe Jacobs has taken too many blows to the head?

These invaders, and even far too many of their LEGAL counterparts, reject our culture and the great ideas from our Western Heritage. That western heritage INCLUDES the ideas of Mises, Hayek, and Rothbard. And Jacobs wants the barbarians to continue to invade us? How crazy is that?

This is suicidal thinking.

As I mentioned before, these are criminally-prone barbarians (especially when compared to the lawful Asian immigrant) and far too many of them come here and adopt the customs of our LOWEST classes. This has a degrading impact on Americans: more crime, more drug abuse, more gangs, and greater ignorance.

Yet Libertarians say: WELCOME!!

It is not possible to ask every person who arrives on the planet if they would like to join up with such and such a country or not even have a country. This is nonsense! It is like reinventing the wheel billions and billions of times each generation. We no sooner get every person at the age of consent to agree where to live and then switch locations or throw away an old government for a new one, then we have to start all over again asking a whole bunch billion more to inform themselves of libertarian philosophy (or just invade a neighboring land ala Glenn Jacobs), THEN deliberate on which government they want or don't want (AGAIN), or create or recreate or destroy a government or body politic (AGAIN), then let them all give their "consent". Why, it's as simple as that Dorothy and we ain't in Kansas anymore. We are "somewhere over the rainbow"!

It's the most ridiculous thing I ever heard! It is chaos posing as anarchy. It is chaos giving a bad name to anarchy, if such a thing is possible.

It is an idea only the confused (and those without love of country) would advocate.

The heritage of any people is just what it implies: inherited. Sorry, but there is no better way to do it. This is why the family is so important, it transfers property (land, money, businesses, furniture, and COUNTRY) from one generation to another AND it transfers a body politic from one generation to another as well. The family is to bequeath all these things. This is one reason why blacks are in such a pickle, they have such a high rate of broken families who then cannot transfer property and wealth to their posterity. Each generation must reinvent the wheel, in the case the weal, or wealth.

Unfortunately, some type of superstructure over the family is the only way to transmit food and shelter to our children. It is not that government should provide these things, but government provides the space to obtain them and transmit them (along with the system that protects the transmission) to our offspring.

If we don't have a predetermined macro-geographical area in which to live, the micro-geographical life becomes impossible because of INVADERS, plunderers, enslavers, and murderers.

Libertarians deny that this is true. And to that extent, in America's situation, they unwittingly advocate genocide (which they condemn when others do it).

http://adventuresofcitizenx.com/2009/07/20/some-food-for-thought-on-immigration.aspx

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Don't Mess With the US Government's WASP Genocide in America!

2009-08-02T15:56:00.001-07:00

You gotta love him sometimes. Sheriff Arpaio of Arizona is as bristly as a desert cactus and sometimes as funny as the cartoon character Yosemite Sam.

Arpaio is currently not cooperating with the dangerous, subversive, extremist, genocide-mongers at the Department of Homeland Security who are upset that Arpaio is securing the homeland.

The DHS is more interested in defending the nation from those who love her than those who invade her. Loyal Americans appear to be the enemy of the DHS, not those who come to plunder and destroy her.

Here's the story from Google News's Amanda Myers.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i4nY72M0hFVOHUzIrqYpD67DoBxgD99PKJR80

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Michelle Obama: Promoter Of Genocide?

2009-07-31T01:31:00.000-07:00

Rush Limbaugh played a portion of an audio clip (SEE it here at You Tube) on his radio show this week (perhaps on Wednesday). The audio clip was of Michelle Obama in Puerto Rico (May of 2008) making a presidential campaign speech for her husband, Barack Hussein Obama.

In the speech she tells the audience of campaign workers and others that Obama (and by implication, the US government) must change our traditions and history.

The part about changing history is a very weird statement because we cannot change history unless we lie about it. I trust she is not really advocating that, but who knows.

The important part of her statement from the standpoint of this blog is the part about changing our traditions. To intentionally force a change of traditions on a whole country, or an innocent part of it that is sure to be harmed by it, is a violation of International Law and a committing of genocide.

In the light of the Democratic Party's past (since 1965) and continued effort to reduce the white population of the United States by increasing the non-white, non-western civilization population through immigration (and charging the whites for the bill of this genocide), and destroying our Constitutional form of government, it should be no surprise then that our new president or his wife would set a course for the US government to forcibly change our traditions.

Mrs. Obama's thinking, coupled with being married to a man who appears to be a Factor1 psychopath, probably explains why Americans are living in dreadful fear of the Obama administration (Wikipedia).

I must say, the CIA has to know that Barack Obama is a clear and present danger, and appears to have serious mental problems. The questions are, is that good or bad for the CIA? And do they give a damn? (I mean, give a damn about America and its welfare).

It may be that having a psychopathic president at any time is a good thing for the CIA which appears to be sold out to the treasonous Council on Foreign Relations.

May God have mercy on us who love America (which naturally eliminates all democrats).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afGz0dzVSIU

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

Genocide Includes the Destruction of Culture: Liberian Rape Case USA

2009-07-24T05:55:00.000-07:00

People from Liberia are not fit for immigrating to the United States. They are not fit even before this story broke. Liberians share virtually nothing in common with us and will, like most other primitive or barbaric third world peoples, reject our ways.

Bringing people here in large numbers who refuse to adopt our ways is an act of government sponsored genocide. Notice the emphasis on the cultural issues in the article linked to below. Destroying the WASP culture in America by flooding it with foreigners who reject it, is a LEGAL definition of genocide.

Here is the AP story at AZ Central by Amanda Myers.

Stop the US government sponsored genocide today. Please write your legislators today and demand a moratorium on all immigration and a return to traditional immigration patterns that focused on groups who would easily adapt to and blend in with our culture.

http://www.azcentral.com/community/phoenix/articles/2009/07/23/20090723abrk-phxsexassault23-ON.html

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Mainstream-Media Black Out on Black Racist Attack

2009-07-10T10:27:00.000-07:00

It has been a full day now (I believe) since the story ran (I think at Drudgreport.com) about the blacks who attacked a white family in Ohio while shouting black supremacist remarks. People aren't sure this is a "hate crime". Apparently blacks cannot be perpetrators of such things and whites cannot be victims of it. In other words: it's OKAY to "hate" whites.

I just googled Google and did not find on the first two whole pages of searches ANY main articles by the major news outlets mentioning this racist attack. None from ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox News, or the few remaining, impotent, major newspapers like the New York Times.

The main link, the first one called "News Results" takes the reader to the American Daily online. Yes. I never heard of it either. Oh, and you can see that Stormfront (the white supremacist group that left-wingers go berserk over) is reporting the story. That pops up on the first page of the Google search too. It's getting bad when the white supremacists are in the lead on Google for keeping track of the violent black supremacists among us because of a media black-out by the leftists who are mostly democrats (except Fox News).

Now you know why America is in the throes of a WASP genocide: the media is complicit in it. And the government is conducting it.

If this had been the other way around and whites had done this to blacks, there would be "wall to wall coverage" and frothing, and spastic hysteria for days on end from the mainstream media until someone's head rolled or congress acted to clamp more chains on our freedom.

http://americandaily.com/index.php/article/1786

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

We Don't Need 15 Million New Dumb-Asses

2009-07-06T05:07:00.000-07:00

It's one thing to lurk around committing genocide in the shadows, and another to openly promote it in the media.

Genocidal tools like the illegal invader Alicia Alvarez tells the Massachusetts Telegram that she is a good person and should be able to stay in America. This after having burglarized her way into the country for twenty years siphoning-off (stealing) public services and stealing jobs from real Americans. Some good!

I find that this is how Hispanic genociders, in general and in particular, feel about the whole matter of their slithering into this country to rob us of our heritage and prosperity. As long as they keep themselves out of jail, they think they are not dirty-rotten, stinking, scoundrels. Well, I got news for them, they are.

The last thing America needs is 15 million foreigners who think wrong is right. We have enough of those kind of people already in the White House and the Democratic and Republican parties.

According to the Telegram, Alvarez came to America from Uruguay. Well, this low-life illegal invader came here precisely because Uruguay is loaded with snakes like Ms. Alavarez who have no morals and have thus made their country a place where even nitwits like Alvarez have to flee from.

Dumb-asses who say they don't steal from others WHILE they are stealing from others eventually wind-up creating a whole society of dumb-asses that even dumb-asses can no longer stand. Then these dumb-asses burglarize new territory because they cannot stand the dumb-ass one they already created. But they continue on with their old dumb-ass ways in their new territory and will not be happy about that either because they end-up rebuilding the dumb-ass culture they left. They do all this nonsense because they are dumb-asses, of course.

Ms. Alvarez, you are a criminally-minded person who came here to do to America what you did in Uruguay: cultivate immoral beliefs, practice corruption, and ruin the culture. (But, apparently to get more money for it).

GO AWAY.

http://www.telegram.com/article/20090705/NEWS/907050377/1101/RSS01&source=rss

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

US Government Ignores Tucson Medical Center Genocide

2009-07-02T23:49:00.000-07:00

Government sponsored genocide of the majority, native-born Americans of European descent continues full-speed ahead. This time by negligence. These days, it seems like the cops arrest everyone but the bad guys, and the people at TMC are REAL bad--genocidal bad.

It makes you wonder what's so bad about secession if US government approved genocide is so good?

Tucson Medical Center officials should be charged with treason and punished with the utmost severity. And just where is that proverbial crazed police officer with a taser when you need one anyway?

Alas, Barack Hussein Obama supports the genocide, so don't get your hopes up.

http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/metro/297932.php

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

Pat Buchanan Makes Note of the California Genocide

2009-06-29T19:54:00.000-07:00

There is no place in America where the US government's program of genocide through immigration is more obvious than in California.

Read Pat's article here at Vdare online.

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.