Do Gooder White Liberals Spend Their Wealth On Non-Citizens While Americans Suffer

March 25, 2011 A.D.

Rich white liberals spend a lot of money overseas on fruitless philanthropic projects to help others who are often not even willing to help themselves. One cannot help people from the ground up like the singer Madonna is doing in Malawi. The New York Times online has this article about her school in Malawi (or what is left of it before its collapse). The collapse may foreshadow the ultimate futility of her efforts.

Leaders of backwards nations must be willing to lift up their people and they cannot themselves be corrupt or such aid won't work. If this is not the case then rich foreigners end up throwing away their money. In many areas where lily-white liberals tend to go around the world (and we often get the feeling that it is to prove they are not racists) they are dealing in populations with low IQs. Liberals have to understand that IQ plays a serious role in explaining the circumstances of the down trodden and the leaders which come forth from among them. And it plays a role especially where education is concerned.

Herding children into schools isn't the only answer and in the beginning it isn't even the best one. IQ is something which cannot be easily changed and it predicts academic abilities. It takes generations to change. Other things have to be done before lavish funds should be appropriated for schools. Gaudy buildings and equipment in areas of the world with people not ready for anything resembling what the western nations view as adequate schools becomes an insult to these people. It is to embarrass them ultimately because they will not be able to achieve what Madonna hopes for them.

What they need first, and for many generations thereafter, is good nutrition and clean water. Good nutrition helps raise IQ levels. You simply cannot educate a rock and expect a flower to grow. You have to wait for some rich soil to appear first and that takes years of adequate and sustained nutrition. This should be her (or anyone who cares) focus. And since Madonna doesn't run Malawi, her efforts are likely futile.

After generations of good nutrition (good luck) you still won't need expensive schools to educate children in third world conditions. What a waste of money! Just send books. Send paper, pencils, and crayons. Send more books. Then some more. More paper. More books. Paper. Pencils. Then books.

But don't build an expensive school. That is stupid.

There has been centuries of missionary work by Christians in these down-trodden areas of the world long before Madonna noticed other peoples' suffering. And there has been decades of educating the best of young foreign nationals in Western schools who then return to their homelands. Yet little headway has been made in many areas of the world where the intellectual capacity of the citizens is problematic. Had rich liberals helped with this missionary work last century, which always focused on nutrition and clean water, things might have been better at this time for these unfortunate people.

But leftists like Madonna did virtually nothing (often condemning) to help American Christians in the field living side by side with the down-trodden while exposing themselves to many hardships, trials, and suffering. Had the rich liberals and leftists in America not been frothing Christophobic bigots and sat idly by while others reached out to help, things might be more fruitful for the Madonnas of the world.

I'm not saying Madonna is a bigot. She had a Catholic upbringing and now she is dabbling in Jewish mysticism. So she appears to be searching for the truth and I doubt she would attack Christianity.

But these leftist late-comers for the most part ignored the pleas of missionaries from the darkest corners of planet for nearly a century. And now they are just throwing good money at bad ideas. It's a crying shame and they should leave these matters to those already in the field working with the poor and unfortunate people in the undeveloped world.

There is much trouble in America and so many people in need. Yet one wonders why rich leftists like George Soros, Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, Peter Lewis, and John Kerry who became rich because of the blessings of liberty provided by this country waste their money overseas or waste it in political shenanigans at home. They don't rebuild crumbling infrastructure projects that need repair. They don't help old people with their health care. They don't start hospitals for the poor. Yes, they spend some of their wealth here, but they often piddle their money away overseas while their countrymen suffer.

Madonna couldn't help provide some old people in America with their health insurance? She couldn't purchase expensive medical equipment for handicapped Americans? She couldn't fund the building of a needed water purification or sanitation system in a poor area of the United States? There was no small bridge in a poor area of our country needing repair or rebuilding? Weren't there enough brown American faces to be photographed with to make her face appear even more white?

No rational person believes there wasn't a real need she could have met here in America--the land of her nativity--the country that gave her glory, honor, and wealth. Even if it flopped and buildings collapsed at least the money would have benefited some American somewhere.

Liberals love to prove they are not racists and that they don't have anything against dark people. Yet, for most all of Madonna's professional life she died her hair to look like a Nordic blond, eschewing her naturally dark feature.

Here is a link to a photo of "Madonna". Keep in mind, as you look at the photo, that she hopes to be remembered as a good mother. This, after she did everything in her power to debauch American youth. Other mothers were desperately trying to be good mothers while she undermined their every efforts to do so by her powerful personal media images that reached practically every innocent child in the country, including youths whose mothers would not let their children be a fan of Madonna.

It was weird, as I searched, how that the internet appears to be scrubbed of much of the filthy images Madonna spewed across the planet. Google Images have, generally, nice photos of Madonna as if she was a nice wholesome girl. There are some raunchy photos still, but not much of it. I reckon she might have spent a fortune putting her filthy images down the memory hole and, or, threatening folks with copyright lawsuits if they publish their personal photos of her.

At the peak of her career photos and videos of Madonna's raunchy and vile strutting on stage like a slut were ubiquitous and sent all over the planet and made every decent mother in America pull her hair out. These were average mothers who did not have have the wealth Madonna has to shield their children from the vile and sleazy brand of moral corruption Madonna peddled, and wallowed in, and exposed other mothers' children to.

She might redeem herself to her fellow countrymen, women,and children, by helping her own people in America--even the ones she helped debauch while stepping on them on her way to the top.


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/25/us/25madonna.html?hp

http://www.odt.co.nz/entertainment/music/72298/madonna-wrapping-world-tour-israel

More slutty-like images of Madonna:

http://www.femalebeauty.info/2006/madonna-voted-the-worlds-greatest-sex-symbol.html

http://www.life.com/image/83617034